IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TLS] Request for mail testserver with TLS accepting renegotiation

Matt McCutchen <matt@mattmccutchen.net> Wed, 27 July 2011 00:05 UTC

Return-Path: <matt@mattmccutchen.net>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC88621F84DE for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 17:05:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tFgwpn2sVGBH for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 17:05:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from homiemail-a6.g.dreamhost.com (caiajhbdccac.dreamhost.com [208.97.132.202]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47FA821F84A1 for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 17:05:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from homiemail-a6.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a6.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 074E359806C; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 17:05:25 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=mattmccutchen.net; h=subject:from :to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date:message-id :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s= mattmccutchen.net; b=ZsoioKSfl+APjYpnOcUVWl2swe7wYwu8QBbknS3XAUF DYnWMDWa2eDGdHi+PVqX6+/HtKUn6flRz/vbiaSa3gb50snBplnuDP/FmyNISp9C o1Ror3l6boTDPHZbKHl0cLqWaB2roq0jTvQ4S5eG2eUJQeBqM8UMDvIEn99dBwGs =
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=mattmccutchen.net; h= subject:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; s= mattmccutchen.net; bh=lUd7UFr+B9o4ikM7NkWjwNr4rkU=; b=A+TVsJmZ+B f87zYB8ZZOCelK4Cc6VBGYKA39zf6Ri/c9wqd5advNSfrQUVrtIL4dL1WRtJhZK+ GwfSYZWJiD/W4yvqm+2zvnXPmdkZNXHuVbnLSF9Z6BL16A5TqB8skGdD4DG0LcOK n1UzU4JNlS+GS4O3ducULfPYj5ACqC+j0=
Received: from [192.168.1.39] (pool-74-96-44-194.washdc.east.verizon.net [74.96.44.194]) (using SSLv3 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: matt@mattmccutchen.net) by homiemail-a6.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 82CD1598069; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 17:05:24 -0700 (PDT)
From: Matt McCutchen <matt@mattmccutchen.net>
To: "Yngve N. Pettersen" <yngve@opera.com>
In-Reply-To: <op.vy83d3iqkvaitl@lessa-ii.oslo.os>
References: <op.vy83d3iqkvaitl@lessa-ii.oslo.os>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 20:05:22 -0400
Message-ID: <1311725122.7071.23.camel@localhost>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.3
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: tls@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [TLS] Request for mail testserver with TLS accepting renegotiation
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 00:05:25 -0000

On Wed, 2011-07-27 at 01:55 +0200, Yngve N. Pettersen wrote:
> I have recently upgraded my TLS Prober to test email servers (IMAP, POP,  
> SMTP).
> 
> However, I am uncertain about whether the test for testing client  
> initiated renegotiation works properly, particularly since a test of  
> 300000+ servers failed to detect a single email server that accepted it  
> (or requested it).
> 
> It might of course be that all email servers have this functionality  
> disabled, but for now I am assuming something is wrong about how the test  
> itself works.
> 
> If anyone have an email server that is configured to accept client  
> initiated renegotiation that I could test, I would appreciate it.

Is your test in any way specific to email protocols?  If you just run
"openssl s_server" interactively, it seems to accept all
client-initiated renegotiation by default (at least when renegotiation
indication is used).

-- 
Matt

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email