IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TLS] open issues for draft-ietf-tls-chacha20-poly1305-00

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Tue, 04 August 2015 16:20 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8384E1A1AA6 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 09:20:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.311
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.311 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id inggoRGUpq-T for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 09:20:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from prod-mail-xrelay02.akamai.com (prod-mail-xrelay02.akamai.com [72.246.2.14]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 064C51A6FFD for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 09:20:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from prod-mail-xrelay02.akamai.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by postfix.imss70 (Postfix) with ESMTP id E59D229570; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 16:20:20 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from prod-mail-relay07.akamai.com (prod-mail-relay07.akamai.com [172.17.121.112]) by prod-mail-xrelay02.akamai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C80302956E; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 16:20:20 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=akamai.com; s=a1; t=1438705220; bh=FngxOm69kxKmI21UBbNEGqPYXpVJqh14yAVdxy1oD1g=; l=140; h=From:To:CC:Date:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=GTgRKSbSI7rskER0KhGBP6zaouod48x31DY+07fH9mvgj6aYUkvJ35Kame9OOoHbb yb2V8V/0L2YbC9LNhJYj7XQAGPIN3wPwsdz+znPMqkwMb843XrWEbRL/lOi8TRlToN tKgKDx7QM5P7Lsb9n0X6DDWJWWm0NNkaReOooJGA=
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com (ustx2ex-cas1.msg.corp.akamai.com [172.27.25.30]) by prod-mail-relay07.akamai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE5318008D; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 16:20:20 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from USTX2EX-DAG1MB2.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.27.102) by ustx2ex-dag1mb5.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.27.105) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1076.9; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 11:20:20 -0500
Received: from USTX2EX-DAG1MB2.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.6.132]) by ustx2ex-dag1mb2.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.6.132]) with mapi id 15.00.1076.000; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 11:20:20 -0500
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos <nmav@redhat.com>
Thread-Topic: [TLS] open issues for draft-ietf-tls-chacha20-poly1305-00
Thread-Index: AQHQzrJa9kGS0C0C5E+zxa5T6wEh0538V/yA//+teDA=
Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2015 16:20:19 +0000
Message-ID: <c2baa76f65b846d29868989886814981@ustx2ex-dag1mb2.msg.corp.akamai.com>
References: <1438691824.10777.9.camel@redhat.com> <CABkgnnVLahWvJ1ONUW7RLTuUVj1nrGVwgxBGsh2A58r1Gjf3aw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnVLahWvJ1ONUW7RLTuUVj1nrGVwgxBGsh2A58r1Gjf3aw@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.19.39.83]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/1bMTsAYClyiuZPGgZ9g87rtUOYo>
Cc: "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [TLS] open issues for draft-ietf-tls-chacha20-poly1305-00
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2015 16:20:23 -0000

> Personally, I would rather see the nonce construction follow the form
> defined in the respective TLS version.

Yes, consistency.  +1

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email