IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TLS] comments on draft-ietf-tls-tls13-19

Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos <nmav@redhat.com> Wed, 29 March 2017 14:32 UTC

Return-Path: <nmav@redhat.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2603C129531 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 07:32:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.923
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.923 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GsPK6o6aSY6c for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 07:32:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1BC8F129526 for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 07:32:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0CA2EC06C9E8 for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 14:32:41 +0000 (UTC)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com 0CA2EC06C9E8
Authentication-Results: ext-mx08.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com
Authentication-Results: ext-mx08.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=nmav@redhat.com
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mx1.redhat.com 0CA2EC06C9E8
Received: from dhcp-10-40-1-102.brq.redhat.com (unknown [10.40.3.166]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B6EA8764B for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 14:32:39 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <1490797957.28079.20.camel@redhat.com>
From: Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos <nmav@redhat.com>
To: "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 16:32:37 +0200
In-Reply-To: <1490797726.28079.18.camel@redhat.com>
References: <1490797726.28079.18.camel@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.16
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.32]); Wed, 29 Mar 2017 14:32:41 +0000 (UTC)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/1e1Cd1nnRfms3LLmmdZhVUUvwDo>
Subject: Re: [TLS] comments on draft-ietf-tls-tls13-19
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 14:32:45 -0000

On Wed, 2017-03-29 at 16:28 +0200, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote:

> A more general note on the section/document, is that although the
> PKIX
> identity (certificate) is protected from passive adversaries, the PSK
> identity is not. This is a discrepancy in terms of protecting the
> user's identity between PSK and certificate authentication (that
> should
> warrant .

... an entry in the security considerations.

> 4.2. rfc6961 is standard's track but TLS 1.3 only uses the RFC6066
> status request. Why not require RFC6961?

Please ignore that. I forgot to delete in my draft.

regards,
Nikos

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email