IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TLS] TLS@IETF101 Agenda Posted

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Wed, 14 March 2018 19:15 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FF92124C27 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Mar 2018 12:15:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.801
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.801 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GFOQhdO-74mv for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Mar 2018 12:15:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9001:583::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E0607124BAC for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Mar 2018 12:15:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0050093.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0050093.ppops.net-00190b01. (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w2EJDBol020904; Wed, 14 Mar 2018 19:15:17 GMT
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-id : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=s5a1HZuNazysTqnGaB9Vf9Ckvgm8SFUPKm2cZsO1lOY=; b=K0iU/MO0mwG+UAnEcuNA+X6wKdR1y23YUU8+5Pnp48XViQGsgsDdP+E8j5rPNIAZUOQz 1stTcXzp51WNbn/ZlvAfrHyd+P7bpGYsZvJrsmNPfMBQEVuUgj3DF82QBD+3yWM8PFjO lgllkDCqKzwsOVJZXuz5lNp6acOZP63/8CAF0/0Tju1546f9/hdncwMLWltBYNrRquFT i+sH06bHgp4FutGYW5LPt9iP9kYVg1CFVV3veOV9mX/NRAyQARBqbY2BVyNhxAGs3re9 R+ATii0k9RrEfCghlkBfA86Q+VSuqhee6ktziQBLty2i+BiusgKLM9x1KMdKvO9hLNnq kQ==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint2 (prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com [184.51.33.19]) by m0050093.ppops.net-00190b01. with ESMTP id 2gpmuyu7gh-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 14 Mar 2018 19:15:17 +0000
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com (8.16.0.21/8.16.0.21) with SMTP id w2EJBN93001544; Wed, 14 Mar 2018 15:15:16 -0400
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.33]) by prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com with ESMTP id 2gmbjyy05t-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 14 Mar 2018 15:15:16 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB5.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.105) by usma1ex-dag1mb2.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.102) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1263.5; Wed, 14 Mar 2018 15:15:15 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.101) by usma1ex-dag1mb5.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.105) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1263.5; Wed, 14 Mar 2018 15:15:15 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) by usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) with mapi id 15.00.1263.000; Wed, 14 Mar 2018 15:15:15 -0400
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Hubert Kario <hkario@redhat.com>, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
CC: IETF TLS <tls@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [TLS] TLS@IETF101 Agenda Posted
Thread-Index: AQHTtvl2jdjB7/0TLECBbBkkzUJLO6PG6bYAgABgygCAAXVYgIAACUMAgACBwICAAEcAAIAE8GYAgAAMrwCAAA5/gP//vtmAgABEIID//8M5gIAARI0AgAAVGgCAABigAIAAEqmAgAAefoCAAPEfAIAAaF+AgAAFZoD//72pAA==
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2018 19:15:14 +0000
Message-ID: <9F72213D-9271-4CE4-BF46-CB9815381504@akamai.com>
References: <6140B7A6-A1C7-44BC-9C65-9BE0D5E1B580@sn3rd.com> <12691059.D1o9753ySB@pintsize.usersys.redhat.com> <4317390C-51CB-4969-8251-DBA18CBDE0BA@vigilsec.com> <10505832.z7kPpBgRto@pintsize.usersys.redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <10505832.z7kPpBgRto@pintsize.usersys.redhat.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.b.0.180311
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.19.41.158]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <F7A72BA76CDB224F82434D7A42AEFCAA@akamai.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2018-03-14_10:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=765 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1711220000 definitions=main-1803140209
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2018-03-14_10:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=690 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1711220000 definitions=main-1803140209
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/1qSd0tdM72v7Ns-1gWtfwP6d0Zk>
Subject: Re: [TLS] TLS@IETF101 Agenda Posted
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2018 19:15:19 -0000

>    while sure, both TLS 1.0 and TLS 1.2 likely will be removed from those afore-
    mentioned libraries at _some_ point, it is disingenuous to suggest it will 
    happen in a matter of just few years, especially for the latter of the two 
    protocols
  
Absolutely true!

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email