[TLS] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-tls-tls13-cert-with-extern-psk-04: (with COMMENT)

Alissa Cooper via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Thu, 19 December 2019 13:54 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: tls@ietf.org
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 974D9120241; Thu, 19 Dec 2019 05:54:47 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Alissa Cooper via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: "The IESG" <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-tls-tls13-cert-with-extern-psk@ietf.org, Joseph Salowey <joe@salowey.net>, tls-chairs@ietf.org, joe@salowey.net, tls@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.113.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
Message-ID: <157676368761.27454.108976243186682719.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2019 05:54:47 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/1vp8fS5DBWkOEShX9u99cOX2fSs>
Subject: [TLS] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-tls-tls13-cert-with-extern-psk-04: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2019 13:54:47 -0000

Alissa Cooper has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-tls-tls13-cert-with-extern-psk-04: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)

Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.

The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:


Building on a point Barry made, I think it would be useful to distinguish in
the document whether this spec is experimental because we are waiting for
quantum computers to materialize, or whether it is experimental because current
implementors want to gain more experience with it before standardization. That
way if it does come back at some future point on the standards track the
context for why it was experimental in the first place will be there.

Please respond to the Gen-ART reviewer.