Re: [TLS] SHA-3 in SignatureScheme

"Blumenthal, Uri - 0553 - MITLL" <uri@ll.mit.edu> Fri, 02 September 2016 19:28 UTC

Return-Path: <prvs=8053eb0eee=uri@ll.mit.edu>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C49A912B00C for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Sep 2016 12:28:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.745
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.745 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.548, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aYVVNjks9M7P for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Sep 2016 12:28:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from llmx2.ll.mit.edu (LLMX2.LL.MIT.EDU [129.55.12.48]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B815B12B036 for <tls@ietf.org>; Fri, 2 Sep 2016 12:28:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from LLE2K10-HUB02.mitll.ad.local (LLE2K10-HUB02.mitll.ad.local) by llmx2.ll.mit.edu (unknown) with ESMTP id u82JOOmJ037151; Fri, 2 Sep 2016 15:24:24 -0400
From: "Blumenthal, Uri - 0553 - MITLL" <uri@ll.mit.edu>
To: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>, Hubert Kario <hkario@redhat.com>
Thread-Topic: [TLS] SHA-3 in SignatureScheme
Thread-Index: AQHSBHfFOWP+vPLKs0GIS/iOWjsWWqBlKtOAgAAJZICAAAPZAIAAUWsAgAC0oICAAAl4AIAADc8AgABBQACAABuegIAAAK6AgAAF4gCAABO4gIAAC90AgAAAVgD//76TAA==
Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2016 19:28:03 +0000
Message-ID: <788EC484-6FFE-4A0E-BAAA-0C29EBECEF12@ll.mit.edu>
References: <7755682.Cma8FBTrvx@pintsize.usersys.redhat.com> <4536302.2GJhFoeUiN@pintsize.usersys.redhat.com> <BC6013EC-26EF-4EF7-AE5C-37D70D9CFF50@gmail.com> <1489216.MHQYH3hEiU@pintsize.usersys.redhat.com> <CABcZeBNJaKSNSWko+zCKURTNHS0iAcmFtm4keQrFLwoZazM4cg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABcZeBNJaKSNSWko+zCKURTNHS0iAcmFtm4keQrFLwoZazM4cg@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.19.0.160817
x-originating-ip: [172.25.177.156]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha384; boundary="B_3555674882_905389340"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2016-09-02_06:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=inbound_notspam policy=inbound score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1604210000 definitions=main-1609020258
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/1xPZ-YCiDp-f5cNS6qH1owBxgfM>
Cc: "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [TLS] SHA-3 in SignatureScheme
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2016 19:28:09 -0000

On 9/2/16, 15:22 , "TLS on behalf of Eric Rescorla" <tls-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of ekr@rtfm.com> wrote:

But then we have:
* AES and ChaCha (two modes for the former one even)
* RSA and ECDSA
* NIST curves and Bernstein curves
* ECDHE key exchange an DHE key exchange

only the SHA-2 stands alone...

 

     We have SHA-256 and SHA-384.

 

No. By the same token we have AES-128, AES-256, ECDHE over P256, etc.

 

I support adding SHA-3 to the core. 

 

Alternatively, feel free to throw ChaCha out and define it separately. Same with Bernstein’s curves. Why keeping them all in the core?