Re: [TLS] Updating for non-X.509 certificate types

Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Fri, 10 March 2017 18:53 UTC

Return-Path: <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F32B1296CA for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 10:53:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9GzchBPylxD0 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 10:53:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yw0-x232.google.com (mail-yw0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 29B97129595 for <tls@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 10:53:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-yw0-x232.google.com with SMTP id o4so29413656ywd.3 for <tls@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 10:53:28 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=wILDW39mhEm38u9Cf6Vp0umdMtZS0ItpQ5MkV7RTsVg=; b=RMvBy/mIQwYneV4wsSdmjswBl991fuhVSm2FlJOZUEHu8Air1eFv99fcFb/7JiVEDY TXbu3syLw2L6Zs38v6cj9UBCSqzCSkDlGzY1JGpLsNKcJba6XmDIYOjhGMK4as/bIziF cVHCtNqu+yHa4gJtbgt6C0Cb69u4b2K1TZshG4OKaefm1JghIP9/r3E9iTYlIi0/KxU9 d/287s9x8vSbv71VrxRTFSdVSB5dINFRoX4/8uvjnLyMvYpHBmIJtFzodKTkWF0LlOm7 3pQYAnzj9GjLneyI09pTX6CVog0Cx/FmQjDo98MG86bbM7WT/9iRjDgjrxYfi5ARkZe1 7uqw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=wILDW39mhEm38u9Cf6Vp0umdMtZS0ItpQ5MkV7RTsVg=; b=Oc8aLT9IaUG5XeOQfiBISiz+fBjXHwnThlEHBoU0gQczw3f3LZm/EhXYfMUVUtBbqZ /JsH6QVm5EdGRodpI26R/r/jGipe5dHr3VQ/ae9tn6pCHnhLqAQq8qsW2gkbbGZpA2qR AE1JtO57uCpBHFYdapgrzFg7zeVgki6BOqAwhqDrxMJTrHmIIaLT1cr9BhWxgv0ERapL pIG1klcZR6SiGloMCHZZDB/qce8Hs/7VuVpSGUHXC22GJmP+QKslmR7tq8+a4I8PcUt/ wLiZKY3CnbKxt/r9++OIiz7VLjJJzbbfylMP1qsxTgPZ9c2cKNYBPQCuHaLoDpeBZr9D AqYA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39l0+k5nCyvVgIP8bNyn06YJyj3W+yiuIsbc2FK46mTQRbADWdB2hl1SVtShC400aB5j/TkNk3GzZdQgjg==
X-Received: by 10.129.108.214 with SMTP id h205mr8992746ywc.71.1489172007437; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 10:53:27 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.129.154.210 with HTTP; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 10:52:46 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <DM2PR21MB00914AC3F20BF3D8E266F0768C200@DM2PR21MB0091.namprd21.prod.outlook.com>
References: <CABcZeBNGkZVpoGqkc_ePF12mC0HaJgNbytXV70eV4oBBcyD2HQ@mail.gmail.com> <20170310124013.GA1197@LK-Perkele-V2.elisa-laajakaista.fi> <CABcZeBNuVB1pdZiQmn87asfF=ARgNNTkzVM2vnyZZ1VPJ4-B+g@mail.gmail.com> <20170310163738.GA1636@LK-Perkele-V2.elisa-laajakaista.fi> <CABcZeBPeRYSVOXRm4rReQ-f3E1giJYiVgwJ4PmEOP7zaiZiRdQ@mail.gmail.com> <DM2PR21MB00914AC3F20BF3D8E266F0768C200@DM2PR21MB0091.namprd21.prod.outlook.com>
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 10:52:46 -0800
Message-ID: <CABcZeBMFVNSPa2h7=Z2yFFjaFYJ5y-2VVqkcJZzoXnrfvWRRNg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Andrei Popov <Andrei.Popov@microsoft.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114e81dc8357d5054a64e027
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/1xngG-HvtoRaNPlNuKsUZccreW8>
Cc: "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [TLS] Updating for non-X.509 certificate types
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 18:53:29 -0000

On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 10:04 AM, Andrei Popov <Andrei.Popov@microsoft.com>
wrote:

> Ø  Does anyone use this?
>
> Ø  I don't think anyone uses it.
>
>
>
> Au contraire: Windows TLS stack supports user_mapping and this mechanism
> appears to be somewhat in use. However, I agree that this falls into the
> category of extensions that need to be either deprecated or redefined for
> TLS 1.3.
>

Are you OK with deprecated followed by redefined with a new code point?

-Ekr


>
>
> Cheers,
>
>
>
> Andrei
>