Re: [TLS] The progress about theNegotiated FFDHE proposal

Ilari Liusvaara <ilariliusvaara@welho.com> Sat, 05 December 2015 15:43 UTC

Return-Path: <ilariliusvaara@welho.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CA521A700B for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 5 Dec 2015 07:43:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Rp4tUCTGIP_g for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 5 Dec 2015 07:43:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from filtteri2.pp.htv.fi (filtteri2.pp.htv.fi [213.243.153.185]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBAF71A700A for <tls@ietf.org>; Sat, 5 Dec 2015 07:43:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by filtteri2.pp.htv.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id 573AC19C060; Sat, 5 Dec 2015 17:43:33 +0200 (EET)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at pp.htv.fi
Received: from smtp5.welho.com ([213.243.153.39]) by localhost (filtteri2.pp.htv.fi [213.243.153.185]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2DNPiAdxWMhh; Sat, 5 Dec 2015 17:43:32 +0200 (EET)
Received: from LK-Perkele-V2 (87-92-35-116.bb.dnainternet.fi [87.92.35.116]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp5.welho.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D06535BC002; Sat, 5 Dec 2015 17:43:32 +0200 (EET)
Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2015 17:43:30 +0200
From: Ilari Liusvaara <ilariliusvaara@welho.com>
To: Xuelei Fan <xuelei.fan@vimino.com>
Message-ID: <20151205154330.GA25350@LK-Perkele-V2.elisa-laajakaista.fi>
References: <CAAgBOhu4151RouRNrCOv8p9PC55nTgdDU28QOEryEF7DHb1BAw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAAgBOhu4151RouRNrCOv8p9PC55nTgdDU28QOEryEF7DHb1BAw@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Sender: ilariliusvaara@welho.com
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/22Sc4nN6OAKKYxItt5yx8HyIEF0>
Cc: "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [TLS] The progress about theNegotiated FFDHE proposal
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Dec 2015 15:43:37 -0000

On Sat, Dec 05, 2015 at 11:32:40PM +0800, Xuelei Fan wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Any one know why the negotiated FFDHE draft hang on MISSREF state for more
> than 180 days?
> 
>     http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tls-negotiated-ff-dhe/

Normatively depends on the false-start draft that isn't sent to the
RFC-Editor yet.

The specification itself is done and all the needed codepoints have
been assigned.


-Ilari