IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TLS] chacha/poly for http/2

Wan-Teh Chang <wtc@google.com> Wed, 13 January 2016 18:21 UTC

Return-Path: <wtc@google.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAEC81B3056 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Jan 2016 10:21:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.928
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.928 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100=0.5, RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E8_51_100=1.886, RAZOR2_CHECK=0.922, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7EtntxZz6rlW for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Jan 2016 10:21:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yk0-x229.google.com (mail-yk0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c07::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D43B1B3031 for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Jan 2016 10:21:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-yk0-x229.google.com with SMTP id k129so475730835yke.0 for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Jan 2016 10:21:06 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=7z5g9+b5Syw1z+Q6k0lTl6MdJmLrHlhD8SKR2/yd0I0=; b=i9oNUB7sLiGkTxXkupmG/r3dUiM3AUi2Cpp7DpvC4jS0k1I+ic9QgwfwgdEVHpPOF0 /gmyRECewXwjFmc4kH2ctYguYx6xdeMYX5Dzsia/Z4Gr2h0UaKPPIo+JFTzvgxAaXDKR jo1eaWiSfJshqA1XQxO8stOr6W7pySASZSEbV+aetx8HPxHGkx7M7X7scEzISumdOwdc GWPC3l7SYxf+iVNhzLLOf4dWUoukCeado9XPVzF5k/uzIdCey+Zi1VTNomC/QLhZO0kL fyYhkhoPV1PEceqLXHw/lNCjYOXg46APntp4lF9+UVgEVL6EKwrnGIZJa3WXi1nr/S0/ bL7w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=7z5g9+b5Syw1z+Q6k0lTl6MdJmLrHlhD8SKR2/yd0I0=; b=dFhfcSUT19tSuhthGJh2AMZ0NwXjymLafN/anwU4UCDFVb9WRaAvHz8qcDE10EWvT1 mUyKai3FJbAp4has69zWDF3YxTdo4G979areokDFD/swi60ytZpq20YeFxSYK8SQBGEH LHF7lGQ6P/VQSLrDwl3ywaZrIIQpV392jVqhrRsdJSfMfUOl0WtpHpdARIMJeiK7BYil OzaznqGv6FSislSlG1ZJwMDLo3Pz9DT8HOPxZIAy7qFarMyxjmSUU273n3tA6A30QHT4 2wOtamE5isXfDT9NU5uylY6dGl768bCBfJ3uCbXrPziSldVHuqHDQkP1pxrT5EL7FhuN 6k4Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQk8upx0nwlnA9rCu3rkR6xPXtaY3jK09y88OuM+M908TZOo75LruwbrVDw8UrJm4mge8obnekHExKE5fgTawPCruBFm883qWvCzCn7m8u+oAvHz5oI=
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.13.223.69 with SMTP id i66mr87022061ywe.323.1452709265631; Wed, 13 Jan 2016 10:21:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.37.115.16 with HTTP; Wed, 13 Jan 2016 10:21:05 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <326d1a7af9ae441081f5c272e5758d9f@usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com>
References: <326d1a7af9ae441081f5c272e5758d9f@usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 10:21:05 -0800
Message-ID: <CALTJjxE5ovmrWT7zQ-3NeqfTmg8o8DPFw0hVBoR_gi2UPDWd6g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Wan-Teh Chang <wtc@google.com>
To: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/2ci42vNJopgKhPoLvMGp9qnQGQ8>
Cc: "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [TLS] chacha/poly for http/2
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 18:21:07 -0000

On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 9:48 AM, Salz, Rich <rsalz@akamai.com> wrote:
> We (OpenSSL) have already tested interop of chacha/poly with other browsers
> and TLS stacks, and now it all works.  (The official IETF version, not the
> QUIC version).

Hi Rich,

Did you test interop of chacha/poly with a developer build of Firefox?
The NSS patch is still being reviewed at
https://codereview.appspot.com/277090043/. So official Firefox
releases don't support chacha/poly cipher suite yet.

Wan-Teh Chang

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email