Return-Path: <nico@cryptonector.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1])
 by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 841121A0218
 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Sep 2015 12:57:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.366
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.366 tagged_above=-999 required=5
 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
 DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7]
 autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
 by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id uqgDBFt_3_Xx for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>;
 Wed, 16 Sep 2015 12:57:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from homiemail-a103.g.dreamhost.com (sub4.mail.dreamhost.com
 [69.163.253.135])
 by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D95E1A01F7
 for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Sep 2015 12:57:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from homiemail-a103.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by homiemail-a103.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47E482005E62C;
 Wed, 16 Sep 2015 12:57:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cryptonector.com; h=date
 :from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version
 :content-type:in-reply-to; s=cryptonector.com; bh=Jsqe68egZS4wuF
 KHdJX0ExcPm/s=; b=Okk9jXL0nj7i5FAGKRpLuTnZO8vMtgg3vq9o4RdfSHwsEn
 hHxK+IZavAzxUPHwCgOV67WnOwP8TxxsPocrAKdPF8uNk2BLKGHCFOvGPo8cybpa
 GighQWj+GQ2+U1E2Ci9lc2ivc5kkfWhMjbJ/xlP9q6iTBkig2O+FOPhUoGLoM=
Received: from localhost (108-207-244-100.lightspeed.austtx.sbcglobal.net
 [108.207.244.100]) (Authenticated sender: nico@cryptonector.com)
 by homiemail-a103.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 515582005E62A;
 Wed, 16 Sep 2015 12:57:34 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 14:57:32 -0500
From: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20150916195729.GO13294@localhost>
References: <CAOgPGoBT9C=pWebXShqxhbOsnqK+OZe=-n-SvZ_pH-dAtRaWXQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CABkgnnVDmZ+h2V5=DhJT+bPQuAgvvyOP5kV4F_Y1pqkQKNA=Dg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnVDmZ+h2V5=DhJT+bPQuAgvvyOP5kV4F_Y1pqkQKNA=Dg@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/2mPq4Fp0vJXrn51pKvR69Gn1G1I>
Cc: "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [TLS] Call for consensus to remove anonymous DH
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working
 group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>,
 <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>,
 <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 19:57:36 -0000

On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 10:40:28AM -0700, Martin Thomson wrote:
> On 15 September 2015 at 18:00, Joseph Salowey <joe@salowey.net> wrote:
> > remove anonymous DH
> 
> +1
> 
> It's not like we're making the use case impossible, just that the
> solution will look different.

And will be more costly.

I'm neutral on this, as I don't think the extra cost will lead to, say,
MTAs forgoing TLS for SMTP.

Nico
-- 

