IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TLS] Closing some open comments on draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation

<Pasi.Eronen@nokia.com> Tue, 08 December 2009 09:05 UTC

Return-Path: <Pasi.Eronen@nokia.com>
X-Original-To: tls@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3644E28C0FF for <tls@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Dec 2009 01:05:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.527
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.527 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.072, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ty0ZhJCdl-4f for <tls@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Dec 2009 01:05:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mgw-mx06.nokia.com (smtp.nokia.com [192.100.122.233]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC9DE28C0FD for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Dec 2009 01:05:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from esebh105.NOE.Nokia.com (esebh105.ntc.nokia.com [172.21.138.211]) by mgw-mx06.nokia.com (Switch-3.3.3/Switch-3.3.3) with ESMTP id nB894rgw008030; Tue, 8 Dec 2009 11:05:21 +0200
Received: from vaebh102.NOE.Nokia.com ([10.160.244.23]) by esebh105.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Tue, 8 Dec 2009 11:04:38 +0200
Received: from vaebh101.NOE.Nokia.com ([10.160.244.22]) by vaebh102.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Tue, 8 Dec 2009 11:04:33 +0200
Received: from smtp.mgd.nokia.com ([65.54.30.6]) by vaebh101.NOE.Nokia.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Tue, 8 Dec 2009 11:04:28 +0200
Received: from NOK-EUMSG-01.mgdnok.nokia.com ([65.54.30.86]) by nok-am1mhub-02.mgdnok.nokia.com ([65.54.30.6]) with mapi; Tue, 8 Dec 2009 10:04:27 +0100
From: Pasi.Eronen@nokia.com
To: ekr@networkresonance.com, tls@ietf.org
Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2009 10:04:27 +0100
Thread-Topic: [TLS] Closing some open comments on draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation
Thread-Index: Acp3iMjO5VoiIH1MSEe4SPY4uEN82wAXGhkA
Message-ID: <808FD6E27AD4884E94820BC333B2DB774F31A4FCF1@NOK-EUMSG-01.mgdnok.nokia.com>
References: <20091207220244.DA1A06C5242@kilo.networkresonance.com>
In-Reply-To: <20091207220244.DA1A06C5242@kilo.networkresonance.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Dec 2009 09:04:29.0107 (UTC) FILETIME=[72D22030:01CA77E5]
X-Nokia-AV: Clean
Subject: Re: [TLS] Closing some open comments on draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2009 09:05:38 -0000

Eric Rescorla wrote:

> 2. Add "Updates: RFC 5246, 4366, 4347". Pasi, should we be explicitly
> stating 4346 and 2246? ISTM we already transitively update them, but 
> I don't care either way.

Yes, we should -- since this document is fixing an important bug 
in 2246/4346, we want "Updated by RFCNNNN" to appear in the RFC 
index for 2246/4346, too.

Best regards,
Pasi

v2.28.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status