IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TLS] Call for consensus to remove anonymous DH

Andrei Popov <Andrei.Popov@microsoft.com> Wed, 16 September 2015 18:35 UTC

Return-Path: <Andrei.Popov@microsoft.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EFD41A88A5 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Sep 2015 11:35:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fPZrW734KlIM for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Sep 2015 11:35:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from na01-bl2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bl2on0131.outbound.protection.outlook.com [65.55.169.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9CDF91A88A4 for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Sep 2015 11:35:31 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=selector1; h=From:To:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=2R/L9cuYSOukYxruOwm8gBpzzvmIJNzCFyfsUHTZGpY=; b=MxLI7P/fnN2sUy57q8YuVNmYooeG9zzqjRmWmuUxt6bChqmVSdtZ+o0WO26pGwmgAkFexNS+AUBeBG/0wsoug3aTI/0WY++7PqXAGMmjsBYbPt7ABSkheOYoDq7d0Qfjm76hap/okuRQLCTVm4rLX0OBPRlvQ2lkhPUtVmjhwcs=
Received: from BLUPR03MB1396.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.163.81.142) by BLUPR03MB1396.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.163.81.142) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.268.17; Wed, 16 Sep 2015 18:35:29 +0000
Received: from BLUPR03MB1396.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.163.81.142]) by BLUPR03MB1396.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.163.81.142]) with mapi id 15.01.0268.017; Wed, 16 Sep 2015 18:35:29 +0000
From: Andrei Popov <Andrei.Popov@microsoft.com>
To: Joseph Salowey <joe@salowey.net>, "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [TLS] Call for consensus to remove anonymous DH
Thread-Index: AQHQ8Bsi7TldMlxgZEy+50XQQ7naA54/e/Zg
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 18:35:29 +0000
Message-ID: <BLUPR03MB1396384E6F55D614D6B631818C5B0@BLUPR03MB1396.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
References: <CAOgPGoBT9C=pWebXShqxhbOsnqK+OZe=-n-SvZ_pH-dAtRaWXQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAOgPGoBT9C=pWebXShqxhbOsnqK+OZe=-n-SvZ_pH-dAtRaWXQ@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=Andrei.Popov@microsoft.com;
x-originating-ip: [2001:4898:80e8:4::1d2]
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BLUPR03MB1396; 5:WfLuTxhmj8nqjTgO7FH6eJJQXapjMalgvINE14WRhHuqYQN8zVc+LX9O/FLG0/VvRfv3UAcpRMYjFlPmryN2XOrLUAwTjHERR1IhJVvGC50ZTdU0PTUNx+wu88bigNaWA2o6FlrqZFqmn/IgnxZptw==; 24:bPJ/C2CBe3/bBB6/CC2NCb3cpM93B5k9jGedomwhY07eKi7NDTUNBIbxD9KjhsTHPy0f3iFbqJnrmhiVAxHYohPWBvjM7jyxUsDCc52xWMY=; 20:L2W3hYvx/y/hIqmY5Ftjp1Xa1hOcK08wiSTpwt9X1UTE/Yv9bVsNO1OaxdaeHqzdZVFYfzy1BpJ4ZdvjCiyIGQ==
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BLUPR03MB1396;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BLUPR03MB139647F3679D1B7BBC4B5A7D8C5B0@BLUPR03MB1396.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(108003899814671);
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(601004)(2401001)(5005006)(8121501046)(520078)(520075)(3002001); SRVR:BLUPR03MB1396; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BLUPR03MB1396;
x-forefront-prvs: 07013D7479
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(199003)(189002)(377454003)(164054003)(5003600100002)(86362001)(107886002)(76176999)(5001830100001)(5001770100001)(19617315012)(11100500001)(2950100001)(62966003)(97736004)(86612001)(87936001)(10400500002)(74316001)(102836002)(15975445007)(77096005)(5001960100002)(2900100001)(189998001)(5001860100001)(19625215002)(81156007)(76576001)(92566002)(4001540100001)(16236675004)(68736005)(64706001)(5002640100001)(33656002)(5007970100001)(106116001)(561944003)(46102003)(10090500001)(8990500004)(122556002)(77156002)(105586002)(5004730100002)(2501003)(106356001)(99286002)(5005710100001)(19300405004)(10290500002)(54356999)(40100003)(19609705001)(19580405001)(50986999)(101416001)(19580395003)(3826002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BLUPR03MB1396; H:BLUPR03MB1396.namprd03.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: microsoft.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:23
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_BLUPR03MB1396384E6F55D614D6B631818C5B0BLUPR03MB1396namp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: microsoft.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 16 Sep 2015 18:35:29.3509 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 72f988bf-86f1-41af-91ab-2d7cd011db47
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BLUPR03MB1396
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/3dmti8fA2x-kdJ0PBFGTZdfCjYY>
Subject: Re: [TLS] Call for consensus to remove anonymous DH
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 18:35:37 -0000

To clarify, the proposal includes removing ECDH_anon, right? If it does, I support it.

Cheers,

Andrei

From: TLS [mailto:tls-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Joseph Salowey
Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2015 6:01 PM
To: tls@ietf.org
Subject: [TLS] Call for consensus to remove anonymous DH

There has been some discussion to remove anonymous DH as described in https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg17481.html.  I think ekr's message sums up the pros and cons well.  I don't think we have consensus on this issue yet.  Please respond on this message by Monday, September 21, if you have an opinion.

Thanks,

J&S

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email