IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TLS] Pull Request: Removing the AEAD explicit IV

Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Thu, 19 March 2015 16:26 UTC

Return-Path: <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F7D61ACE31 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Mar 2015 09:26:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gVstXErVLhXb for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Mar 2015 09:26:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-f179.google.com (mail-wi0-f179.google.com [209.85.212.179]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 561731A7005 for <tls@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Mar 2015 09:26:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wixw10 with SMTP id w10so12531440wix.0 for <tls@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Mar 2015 09:26:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=9zSeDCL2+fo7JfakpQztLM5nMkkhaJetXfrvMlAUqF0=; b=FyubQYqRwSF/GKYMXzL+W+BWifLfSwxGE7Lq5hdHFxRUyZP9/34ssKP/KwzbUL9ZIl okysTtFqjyJJ3eMMHjYS+4s57xhHmTgTrPv0Z6+pykC1gxFap3K83VnIkWdz00ouOMJs XFaj03J5MDWIdOz9m7XnKbI/U2DcWXRESdLawmkVTberELh8ydCUolnhv7kM/NB/gHHC RLrVW401rknHAblwx7/JWW4DKgna5TOHQ4p790pHSbIQgLm5QfIofgPp0Nn9RonBrSlf XOLArHKTZLdC0wU43v3CfxoKJtZQu4xA2rBwH/90hBD1h0aUJhYOWsK3WJmi2PFVPDH4 IFDQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmvgdsWkT3PFMAs8Y5sgyNa+82PQnCHY9zAORpifj1Z2CyTIsqXefxRdozsU9n541FFK4va
X-Received: by 10.194.120.230 with SMTP id lf6mr151588555wjb.78.1426782388065; Thu, 19 Mar 2015 09:26:28 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.27.205.198 with HTTP; Thu, 19 Mar 2015 09:25:47 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CACsn0cm09x9oHynJc0FU78TQcdh5EPc2sAbahNSEuLw9nNAeXg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABcZeBPfasM5HmJaATLUHQKRgiSGCreJt1T=UoDBGCbcuzyW8Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAAF6GDdbr57hVa4OD-wCfQtx46bo_D858V_25w8gTtd+M8OhzQ@mail.gmail.com> <CACsn0ckU==QcJhTvyov2DeJCKq_kxvfqK=AkFKsyFcRbQBfC-Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAFewVt6ay5ti9EJRsAm0fLSFjyBHCg_BM0P2DbKHwDxcEWxOmQ@mail.gmail.com> <CACsn0cm09x9oHynJc0FU78TQcdh5EPc2sAbahNSEuLw9nNAeXg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 09:25:47 -0700
Message-ID: <CABcZeBPz6+5RMZ3r6tjbF=D7+GKX8eyYM7+hfJ8MM8rLEyXSgQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e0115fe2469ac800511a6a98d"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/4E15BMJ_zeC9HuuiK91CxC0HFY0>
Cc: "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [TLS] Pull Request: Removing the AEAD explicit IV
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 16:26:31 -0000

On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 9:20 AM, Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 4:33 AM, Brian Smith <brian@briansmith.org> wrote:
> > Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> If we're going to make a change this
> >> radical, why not make equally radical changes to simplify the protocol
> >> further if that's possible?
> >
> > That's already happening.
>
> No it's not: the draft is still longer than the TLS 1.2 RFC,


The TLS 1.3 draft is 91 pages long (
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tls-tls13-05)
RFC 5246 is 103 pages long (https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5246)

-Ekr

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email