Re: [TLS] User Defined Key Pair

"Dan Harkins" <dharkins@lounge.org> Wed, 10 July 2013 17:49 UTC

Return-Path: <dharkins@lounge.org>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30DA121F9EE7 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Jul 2013 10:49:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.265
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.265 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OcscusA0TMg5 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Jul 2013 10:49:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from colo.trepanning.net (colo.trepanning.net [69.55.226.174]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26E6821F9EDA for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Jul 2013 10:49:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from www.trepanning.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by colo.trepanning.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 099CDA888004; Wed, 10 Jul 2013 10:49:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 69.12.173.8 (SquirrelMail authenticated user dharkins@lounge.org) by www.trepanning.net with HTTP; Wed, 10 Jul 2013 10:49:41 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <764a0c52c3800444b69cca4b5b26157c.squirrel@www.trepanning.net>
In-Reply-To: <2A0EFB9C05D0164E98F19BB0AF3708C711B251EFFF@USMBX1.msg.corp.akamai.com >
References: <CALxQUYGdagDHr+A4EKN5qPD1jZG+dH8PHwb0-fKJVUN_vC1MSg@mail.gmail.com> <2A0EFB9C05D0164E98F19BB0AF3708C711B251EE97@USMBX1.msg.corp.akamai.com> <CALxQUYGpcKPOAoZ8J56AoUGx8B3JhdmMche8MdQuqD_S=Y22ZQ@mail.gmail.com> <2A0EFB9C05D0164E98F19BB0AF3708C711B251EF0E@USMBX1.msg.corp.akamai.com> <CALxQUYF1=oFBk=WZFoey+28j7MV7YvSkAD-YzJSeQ0Dp7uXmEA@mail.gmail.com> <2A0EFB9C05D0164E98F19BB0AF3708C711B251EFFF@USMBX1.msg.corp.akamai.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 10:49:41 -0700
From: Dan Harkins <dharkins@lounge.org>
To: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.14 [SVN]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Importance: Normal
Cc: "omh1835@rit.edu" <omh1835@rit.edu>, "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [TLS] User Defined Key Pair
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 17:49:50 -0000

On Mon, June 24, 2013 11:34 am, Salz, Rich wrote:
[snip]
> If you are trying to avoid CA's, then why not just use self-signed
> certificates or similar like PGP?

  Or why not use a protocol that is already a work item of the
TLS working group:

     http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tls-pwd-00

  Dan.