Re: [TLS] rfc7366: status
Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos <nmav@redhat.com> Fri, 12 December 2014 12:12 UTC
Return-Path: <nmavrogi@redhat.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 448D41A1EEA for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 04:12:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.013
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.013 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TfDOfRXQ3JG9 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 04:12:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx4-phx2.redhat.com (mx4-phx2.redhat.com [209.132.183.25]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D23DC1A1A1E for <tls@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 04:12:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from zmail22.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (zmail22.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.83.26]) by mx4-phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id sBCCBhKR027132; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 07:11:44 -0500
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 07:11:43 -0500
From: Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos <nmav@redhat.com>
To: Peter Gutmann <pgut001@cs.auckland.ac.nz>
Message-ID: <1081655876.9710742.1418386303811.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <9A043F3CF02CD34C8E74AC1594475C73AAF329DE@uxcn10-5.UoA.auckland.ac.nz>
References: <9A043F3CF02CD34C8E74AC1594475C73AAF329DE@uxcn10-5.UoA.auckland.ac.nz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Originating-IP: [10.5.82.12]
X-Mailer: Zimbra 8.0.6_GA_5922 (ZimbraWebClient - FF31 (Linux)/8.0.6_GA_5922)
Thread-Topic: rfc7366: status
Thread-Index: AdARyy2xBUfdikGMR7uNIL1XUxOQjCM4ltLV
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/4WZCWaO4NA6Y4yzEtHWkGgmmjYs
Cc: tls <tls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [TLS] rfc7366: status
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 12:12:05 -0000
----- Original Message ----- > I'd sent the following as a private message to some of the people involved in > the discussion, I haven't had any feedback yet so I guess it's OK? In that > case I'll submit it as an update... I wouldn't use "length of" as it isn't used in other TLS-related documents, but rather define it as you did for the content, but other than that it looks ok to me. regards, Nikos
- Re: [TLS] rfc7366: status Peter Gutmann
- Re: [TLS] rfc7366: status Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos