IETF Logo Mail Archive

[TLS]Re: Trust Anchor Negotiation Surveillance Concerns and Risks

Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com> Mon, 22 July 2024 17:32 UTC

Return-Path: <sayrer@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1312BC17C8A9 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Jul 2024 10:32:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QyRau6mzUBqN for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Jul 2024 10:32:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ej1-x630.google.com (mail-ej1-x630.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::630]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 87985C15152E for <tls@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Jul 2024 10:32:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ej1-x630.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-a77ec5d3b0dso435837766b.0 for <tls@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Jul 2024 10:32:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1721669537; x=1722274337; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=xuvyRVafZYDjGxxIfFbz9vlunAIFcFZyr0dsvXbdfZU=; b=X6ZBGSq4bZ2iH+n6gqCRi+6U2AlkKjSbY1cwoiAko6CkHTv7DDj77msqfKunGCAoKV ofU5HmD3THDXcmEon/BmeCshXwLt4KhYqOvEJ6I5B3NA95IBfZ8l72411NTfrlM4ieOm 7HiKceguMrw8VdaKumuyvLmdV7cD6AQZGg8DYbsfb8EFpApRK4IsAHvO9mox2jkWeYbr LuqHfzar7sRyFMWBfvCZwy9m4iy3Ol8m7VOP8rXtcGzWgtKgpfN1QY/Vhtx2YIL4xCLR GL5HPwIaqMoqnbdZBLito9Mc7JlVAQ3VgdYEwESyTqVwHfoF/NJOrp5s6I5ADL39i5tB 3riQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1721669537; x=1722274337; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=xuvyRVafZYDjGxxIfFbz9vlunAIFcFZyr0dsvXbdfZU=; b=OD9FlNAoQzNSKmxMk8FRS3KY11Ru+M54rtQ+RKczVNvBDDSai6OX5VYDjikvY8rDlg im+pO9R0ZxrWQW1GK+3C6QMfpTP3kLD7AHerm84igq1RL3qPOq0z2vXM3Komj8gDmSEl 9Wx8IVkWwKwabCcWAX8cj3j/d6iDWMMa3LNZRcZSjwxYDMolLDUnc0Ho4bVkKZ9qJZEQ 0hFgTxnonD3rIUeIYt5bGTOH18XSHAsvv5wExwSXCOOUWgjpijiLo6oIZDslXBITiweD ZKlDxacBXmYF2XwukgSFvD3BJ2nwpYJVr7S0AC62Fi1/3EYkJsZJ0E7rMVHvwLvwdxTw TXMw==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCUrBFNZRdwMF6SvmDEMEMgeIu0Xzuhyeo7UoX7+vPEB0IANOVUUNF/ei0pi1ptxjsx3hz4oRB3MyFKWRgw=
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwMlsG71sQhEHfrFGGHJ6fXJKOLd14QWLo/l4LVll2EsFTuNC9e +LqFoSOz+38eUN5+64x+/dJnjhyUna/dl4SngVRjkMlkfTT3EDFt4OZ9yuE6/6Ro/xIhqkEHDZz xQlMMqaAlBwnAz7u/I4zQRLtqMD0=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGVYRvVfsCelKbJKsx2ijsqRxhsLl1vfdeJ4P747tc6nihgkkZuBIC/idYXjGt+AwTVyIDoRQ53kIrEN1Plj0I=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:9489:b0:a77:c548:6456 with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-a7a4c424f3dmr466889566b.59.1721669536436; Mon, 22 Jul 2024 10:32:16 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAD2nvsT4qWqudiv1C1wZn6rB4_s-9EDENq5TXEbxr_ygcMFjDQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAChr6Sw+gxK3dO29F9bsLTQReJz6LzT2hZb5O7LAXmKzQbKTSw@mail.gmail.com> <CACf5n7_29CNXLf+SmpKKOWkc_3Oi2BZqZ8irU+z=3btJns_1-Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAChr6SxJ3r88a4Aehv_5fsSWb1JApV6Lg4hfwdm0Oh5x04_shQ@mail.gmail.com> <479BA457-9001-4EBC-A84F-9E3EB71E809F@akamai.com> <CACsn0cmhsh-zeJOaa7xy_2crxgvhAF=nK9FqWxxf1dB2SMhMyQ@mail.gmail.com> <Zpu0reBpH3dtFYdf@LK-Perkele-VII2.locald> <CADQzZqtsj272Gt771Ef=VhS2+WvWKkct0Jx1=wmyS7kTu0ds1w@mail.gmail.com> <CAF8qwaB3VuWSYTi-gH99+N_cgi1ZAdMpzhrSE4=KTD5xbQMwXA@mail.gmail.com> <CADQzZqtyCQwQR2WPrBdqGGUm_tvZ7Akra5z9vqJ30x9vWBtxew@mail.gmail.com> <CAF8qwaDt-vhUb-E48874QLKe-YOc3xzC4VsArzYf_BGREz0+QQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAF8qwaDt-vhUb-E48874QLKe-YOc3xzC4VsArzYf_BGREz0+QQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2024 10:32:04 -0700
Message-ID: <CAChr6SxHFR=KcEK2OdV2wGStmJRE4P-higk7JdXECWufA=vg9g@mail.gmail.com>
To: David Benjamin <davidben@chromium.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000023dcf8061dd96d48"
Message-ID-Hash: UOV2INLTR7P5OB37AXZV2YL2IG3VT5BB
X-Message-ID-Hash: UOV2INLTR7P5OB37AXZV2YL2IG3VT5BB
X-MailFrom: sayrer@gmail.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-tls.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: Mike Shaver <mike.shaver@gmail.com>, TLS List <tls@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [TLS]Re: Trust Anchor Negotiation Surveillance Concerns and Risks
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/4eWHwrxQdTd2UeiXC8UwZHnYoSE>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:tls-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:tls-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:tls-leave@ietf.org>

On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 9:53 AM David Benjamin <davidben@chromium.org>
wrote:

>
> Second, it assumes that the non-web PKI client does not care about the DNS
> name used. When DNS names are purely internal routing labels for API
> endpoints, etc., the exact DNS name used is not particularly significant.
> But when they are user-visible, e.g. in the UI of a web browser,
> redirecting to client-specific services isn't viable. In those situations,
> we similarly would need a different solution.
>

 I looked up the term "dns names" in Google Chrome, through the location
bar, which is not only used for DNS names. The URL I got back was this:

<
https://www.google.com/search?q=dns+names&oq=dns+names&gs_lcrp=EgZjaHJvbWUyCQgAEEUYORiABDIHCAEQABiABDIHCAIQABiABDIHCAMQABiABDIHCAQQABiABDIHCAUQABiABDIHCAYQABiABDIHCAcQABiABDIHCAgQABiABDIJCAkQABgKGIAE0gEIMjE1NGowajeoAgCwAgA&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8
>

This argument doesn't seem compelling to me, aside from the other parts of
the discussion.

thanks,
Rob

v2.36.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status