[TLS] Tommy Jensen's No Objection on draft-ietf-tls-mlkem-10: (with COMMENT)

[Tommy Jensen via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Tommy Jensen has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-tls-mlkem-10: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tls-mlkem/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I note that this document has followed the same kind of edits I requested when
I issued a blocking DISCUSS on the ML-DSA document, already making it clear to
the reader without having to check the IANA registry exactly what Recommended=N
truly means. I appreciate that, as that is what brings this into the realm of
"documenting real-world practices for interop and central visibility reasons is
good even if Recommended=Y isn't true" for me.