Re: [TLS] Barry Leiba's Discuss on draft-ietf-tls-session-hash-05: (with DISCUSS)

Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Thu, 14 May 2015 08:52 UTC

Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 254101B3553; Thu, 14 May 2015 01:52:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.21
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.21 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xEei44ZYG6Sn; Thu, 14 May 2015 01:52:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [134.226.56.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F2F11B3550; Thu, 14 May 2015 01:52:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2F50BE79; Thu, 14 May 2015 09:52:17 +0100 (IST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at scss.tcd.ie
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Q5_TXH2vK1WJ; Thu, 14 May 2015 09:52:16 +0100 (IST)
Received: from [10.87.48.73] (unknown [86.46.19.109]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 66EEEBE54; Thu, 14 May 2015 09:52:16 +0100 (IST)
Message-ID: <55546240.3010902@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Thu, 14 May 2015 09:52:16 +0100
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
References: <20150509225248.21800.83581.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20150509225248.21800.83581.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
OpenPGP: id=D66EA7906F0B897FB2E97D582F3C8736805F8DA2; url=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/51PmXoclVvuXUmmbe-aIhZbrHwk>
Cc: draft-ietf-tls-session-hash.shepherd@ietf.org, draft-ietf-tls-session-hash.ad@ietf.org, tls-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-tls-session-hash@ietf.org, tls@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [TLS] Barry Leiba's Discuss on draft-ietf-tls-session-hash-05: (with DISCUSS)
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 May 2015 08:52:22 -0000

Folks - I note this didn't get an answer. I don't recall that the WG
considered it, and I'm sure if it had the conclusion could have gone
either way (and a random choice would have been fine too:-) but can
you confirm or correct me on that please? If you can do it before the
telechat today (by ~1400 UTC) that'd be great.

Thanks,
S.

On 09/05/15 23:52, Barry Leiba wrote:
> Barry Leiba has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-tls-session-hash-05: Discuss
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tls-session-hash/
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> DISCUSS:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> This is a DISCUSS purely because I want to discuss it; whatever the
> result is, I will be clearing the DISCUSS, and not delaying the document
> on this point:  The last paragraph of Section 4 makes me wonder whether
> this should "update" 5246.  Basically, while this is an extension (which
> wouldn't normally use "updates"), it's one that you're proposing as
> standard behavior, and not really as an extension.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TLS mailing list
> TLS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
>