Re: [TLS] Barry Leiba's Discuss on draft-ietf-tls-session-hash-05: (with DISCUSS)

Folks - I note this didn't get an answer. I don't recall that the WG
considered it, and I'm sure if it had the conclusion could have gone
either way (and a random choice would have been fine too:-) but can
you confirm or correct me on that please? If you can do it before the
telechat today (by ~1400 UTC) that'd be great.

Thanks,
S.

On 09/05/15 23:52, Barry Leiba wrote:
> Barry Leiba has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-tls-session-hash-05: Discuss
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tls-session-hash/
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> DISCUSS:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> This is a DISCUSS purely because I want to discuss it; whatever the
> result is, I will be clearing the DISCUSS, and not delaying the document
> on this point:  The last paragraph of Section 4 makes me wonder whether
> this should "update" 5246.  Basically, while this is an extension (which
> wouldn't normally use "updates"), it's one that you're proposing as
> standard behavior, and not really as an extension.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TLS mailing list
> TLS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
> 