[TLS] Also, on client-random and server-random

Ravi Ganesan <ravi@findravi.com> Wed, 03 February 2010 04:21 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2010 20:22:25 -0800
Message-ID: <3561bdcc1002022022l1734b663wd8cfdb29d9be899@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ravi Ganesan <ravi@findravi.com>
To: tls@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Subject: [TLS] Also, on client-random and server-random
Precedence: list

FWIW, in my deconstruction of why these values exist, it seemed to me
that if you ran the full handshake with only the server-random, and
the abbreviated handshake with only the client-random, you were ok
against the attacks known. (not suggesting one run it without both;
just making an observation as it helps us analyze the importance of
the server-random in abbreviated hanshake).

[TLS] Also, on client-random and server-random Ravi Ganesan
Re: [TLS] Also, on client-random and server-random Adam Langley
Re: [TLS] Also, on client-random and server-random Ravi Ganesan