IETF Logo Mail Archive

[TLS] TLS 1.2

Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Fri, 26 August 2005 23:48 UTC

Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1E8nvl-00015k-Su; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 19:48:17 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1E8nvl-00015f-6j for tls@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 19:48:17 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id TAA01706 for <tls@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 19:48:14 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sierra.rtfm.com ([198.144.203.251]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1E8nwW-0004Dk-Tx for tls@ietf.org; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 19:49:08 -0400
Received: from rtfm.com (romeo.rtfm.com [198.144.203.242]) by sierra.rtfm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19815285E3 for <tls@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 17:30:10 -0700 (PDT)
To: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailer: MH-E 7.4.3; nmh 1.0.4; XEmacs 21.4 (patch 15)
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 16:49:34 -0700
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Message-Id: <20050827003010.19815285E3@sierra.rtfm.com>
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: de4f315c9369b71d7dd5909b42224370
Cc:
Subject: [TLS] TLS 1.2
X-BeenThere: tls@lists.ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.lists.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/tls>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@lists.ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: tls-bounces@lists.ietf.org
Errors-To: tls-bounces@lists.ietf.org

Folks,

I'd like to start a discussion on whether we should be thinking
about a TLS 1.2 that was more oriented towards newer hash 
functions. Obviously, we're not at a point where there's
a crisis yet but it doesn't hurt to be prepared.

Steve Bellovin's and my take on this can be found at:

http://www.educatedguesswork.org/movabletype/archives/2005/07/deploying_a_new.html

Thinking ahead, if we get much list discussion we should probably
plan to have some time in Vancouver...

-Ekr



_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
TLS@lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

v2.28.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status