Re: [TLS] TLS@IETF109: Confirming resolution on lone draft-ietf-tls-dtls-connection-id issue

Christopher Wood <caw@heapingbits.net> Thu, 03 December 2020 20:46 UTC

Return-Path: <caw@heapingbits.net>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F258B3A05F8 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Dec 2020 12:46:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.12
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.12 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=heapingbits.net header.b=BGIIO8cz; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=KHJjSTbX
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UWrSE4QhNNTk for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Dec 2020 12:46:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B30CC3A0D93 for <tls@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Dec 2020 12:46:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id E58C35C0067 for <tls@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Dec 2020 15:46:36 -0500 (EST)
Received: from imap4 ([10.202.2.54]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 03 Dec 2020 15:46:36 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=heapingbits.net; h=mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to:references:date:from:to :subject:content-type; s=fm3; bh=vXGHDKwnWn8Ia2sFkAl3y8DPDZaH67W OU35UJqQ/g5o=; b=BGIIO8czbSWgEYB2FxYnd6QYMQL8mt1ePUkWjH4uJdoKu48 9REd2boARhMMMXLELK2eyJNX40ZsNaQD5KVNgiltP7Nzeih+bxm15W0rmwluF1GV o7TezfSaGF0O3ALEZJ+4t3eqPT9lXL3isF91unb7899UGGcc+RoLAsIZeOBfqN77 xK4q4HprQZCUm31XoR8ViNnKxOVZ1Ddu/jjSynvLgQe00fO1i8K91wD3++ClXPI/ iiXK0NIXOUHfvwE2wGqZDOXTTRiGIXm12ezg8MIpstVP86F6caxHGC38nDtMI8rB 41tCS8WAW3bKB3m3e201fe6Z6pERDCM2gbMv89A==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=vXGHDK wnWn8Ia2sFkAl3y8DPDZaH67WOU35UJqQ/g5o=; b=KHJjSTbXdne+st4uKiw8hD 87FizNRQPDxKHm/qGWURe8jet456pSNpYHnPw0K3aXuvGb9s+jN+3LM+mTMIVe3j qrViReCk+OUKrtppHojwob72djS9S7faCRKJET+/6H2DOrh/LJ3jlNZJRpeUmIMW 88RCSxa14VNQuLmL23BL+xxlr3Ro1vcdYz79Pm7LJoTrNf4avr4XyoWSR6rQsj2T 2OIpLmjxdy2qD5vnk/a4nnRtezUTHHZRwgS6Kh8AqVy59nRtyQSBkJKowJ+rnSNR kkGyoLxLECmuSwzVvm1F1jKFJSKq3+19VzZ3BrNc0+81SHQNt7Nz7XkmtWTZpiSQ ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:rE7JX70xFLvgDFgjiEIHvXaLBUJ7j9a9F0AnbC0OKIV2V-Waq8rBsw> <xme:rE7JX6EXe9T7Gj_2WTyKoiBpos_b2HBjkaF6GKk2rvm2D2DSYIVojECtaHCh1NdNn YrdAVXRftBPoVHFzAI>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedujedrudeiiedgudegfecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepofgfggfkjghffffhvffutgesth dtredtreerjeenucfhrhhomhepfdevhhhrihhsthhophhhvghrucghohhougdfuceotggr fieshhgvrghpihhnghgsihhtshdrnhgvtheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepueeigfekie elueekveejtdeuheejhfffffeigfdvtdetuefgtdelvdehgeffhfefnecuffhomhgrihhn pehgihhthhhusgdrtghomhdpihgvthhfrdhorhhgnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptd enucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomheptggrfieshhgvrghpihhnghgsihhtshdrnhgv th
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:rE7JX74NcG03BiYq4VQB_plF9KTPCDdLDU5l_606Gcd9zZesiHZkTg> <xmx:rE7JXw36Gfkai8ZfeJPwJ3jFBhHTIPQs7e-Erq86haBEbj-M79Atrg> <xmx:rE7JX-Hp9mzkOhFyXzQ50VYNb6Gse30JfO6oZlFxChe5VS5icGzP7A> <xmx:rE7JXyQ3IMigHQ09-TJvjN56g7Sm-6s1m8IIomna_QvxDCrQnIY08A>
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 95BE13C00A1; Thu, 3 Dec 2020 15:46:36 -0500 (EST)
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface
User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.3.0-622-g4a97c0b-fm-20201115.001-g4a97c0b3
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <d44ed7e3-f1ef-4374-b9dc-654371e736bf@www.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <1B23309B-386D-4102-AE43-A1AF12AA2BBB@sn3rd.com>
References: <1B23309B-386D-4102-AE43-A1AF12AA2BBB@sn3rd.com>
Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2020 12:45:54 -0800
From: "Christopher Wood" <caw@heapingbits.net>
To: "TLS@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/5tsoT46vnZW3AdA-EMeok-1FCaA>
Subject: Re: [TLS] =?utf-8?q?TLS=40IETF109=3A_Confirming_resolution_on_lone_d?= =?utf-8?q?raft-ietf-tls-dtls-connection-id_issue?=
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2020 20:47:02 -0000

A PR with the proposed change is here:

   https://github.com/tlswg/dtls-conn-id/pull/77

Please have a look and let the list know if you object to the change. Absent objection, we'll merge it and move the document forward.

Thanks,
Chris

On Tue, Nov 17, 2020, at 9:27 PM, Sean Turner wrote:
> All,
> 
> ekr proposed a fix to address the lone remaining AD review issue: 
> tweaking the MAC (AtE) input; see the later messages in [0]. During the 
> session there was consensus to tweak the proposal to be more like what 
> Ben proposed in email, with the CID length before the CID and the 
> on-the-wire header contiguous in the MAC input. Achim noted and ekr 
> agreed in the thread after the session that what was presented needed 
> to be tweaked. However, it appears that the general way forward, i.e., 
> tweak the MAC (AtE), still holds. If you disagree with this please join 
> the discussion in the thread referenced earlier. Once ekr has proposed 
> a PR, we will run a quick consensus check to make sure we can move this 
> I-D along.
> 
> Cheers,
> Chris, Joe, and Sean
> 
> [0] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/fuIKh0KLOBDxEHO14OloItd87o8/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TLS mailing list
> TLS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
>