[TLS] Fwd: Working Group Last Call: QUIC protocol drafts

Lucas Pardue <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com> Wed, 10 June 2020 02:08 UTC

Return-Path: <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FCC03A0DD0; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 19:08:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.847
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.847 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OngswFE5OJxQ; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 19:08:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr1-x42e.google.com (mail-wr1-x42e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A35F3A0DCC; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 19:08:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr1-x42e.google.com with SMTP id q11so438829wrp.3; Tue, 09 Jun 2020 19:08:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=iVswJkyv/RAqcaEx9aZCWfkY7eA3nos+EosxmLtoQaM=; b=Ah0UzS2rDghSZojjUd+uv1l8Wxi+1w3DRJa7ijtLsxCa6Sp5zhHcNp2+YALhPJcsXo vBWxGla5uAaKrhgQkMjOM3v9/Ff60sC4PzsN3PLvn6/wPanXuaj4NyBXMkA/K21DzjDi wxaYBw00GzlKk8OcGG3B2xazZYOJ5VBZCHDsmWJFInwJnUfqcXTjMo+WjS1/D2VNqHbi LQ0Mn8zor1LREAQBYyQ/WwejfwBykQjendzLZnnKHrGZtxvkm6CIwbsZmmHE4vIQBZAo Zf0jdJ3Wi99KSpegutcQVSjEU7SBL6HQ5/FC4c8cWOIETEfJx9QbUvbg0PUVkddV5mDf J//g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=iVswJkyv/RAqcaEx9aZCWfkY7eA3nos+EosxmLtoQaM=; b=Z4wx1Axrke/2SUoDCLcfndNPTjnwd2Kq7Fs2+1Hy2ENDa/WnDoy2YRdseMSBz0qpjT abHRUNFd+FJpiZOz++zMdIoYLdWEvqtFssCzqUgQmXZ7hEXCowCsx9YSOOPSMvU8pj2D crrKR7BNr/jawelDGMD4vdOxC6/NQf0v4afxYEcMTYTormosdVJJ0VSu5Dh6eZi3eFtP 1Sm+71lrEuA3dUzzyLwLYfthkCPOu40Xu6PKS4AGPfYISRDq6FLGRsDxUygcVnZA9Wnq oMvQhxvn3VvO7EYceJdDbFbA9t/yWUwUKqi6KmYTTF+sX+WrTLeDoXmHaflcFcZXyx+D So3A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533INgjVRWgDEDEuTWrNw104+K0ozNdSXmfF2gbTwH+svHz8xTMW 2v2pgU3EnFQr5H4fVS4ivQ9te59npSmw767NOJ61+WWB
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwAsRtT0JYnzDjpdDtk09jZAzGsEb7Xrhu0umUfVTNbU7s0s74DmPjHW+A6MDzrzReVRBQR0+H9non/P9Ixy/4=
X-Received: by 2002:a5d:4a04:: with SMTP id m4mr907385wrq.153.1591754901521; Tue, 09 Jun 2020 19:08:21 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CALGR9oZ9u=huobnQig0mMPS=-Fu7Mu3q8GHLTBOxd2W5u0h_kw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALGR9oZ9u=huobnQig0mMPS=-Fu7Mu3q8GHLTBOxd2W5u0h_kw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Lucas Pardue <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2020 03:08:10 +0100
Message-ID: <CALGR9oZ-MzUh6JZrM7w97i=64OEZ3JzjzhVir2RBTWm210Fw7w@mail.gmail.com>
To: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, tsvwg@ietf.org, tls@ietf.org
Cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000079877205a7b151ca"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/6KcFe7nro0eklTpqljKjaC2B7CQ>
Subject: [TLS] Fwd: Working Group Last Call: QUIC protocol drafts
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2020 02:08:25 -0000

Hello folks,

Please see the forwarded Working Group Last Call announcement for the QUIC
protocol drafts.

The QUIC WG will only consider feedback directed towards it so please do
not respond to this thread. Instead, review comments need to be opened on
the GitHub repo or sent to the QUIC mailing list as described in the
guidance below.

Lars, Lucas and Mark
QUIC WG Chairs

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Lucas Pardue <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 2:36 AM
Subject: Working Group Last Call: QUIC protocol drafts
To: QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>


After more than three and a half years and substantial discussion, all 845
of the design issues raised against the QUIC protocol drafts have gained
consensus or have a proposed resolution. In that time the protocol has been
considerably transformed; it has become more secure, much more widely
implemented, and has been shown to be interoperable. Both the Chairs and
the Editors feel that it is ready to proceed in standardisation.

Therefore, this email announces a Working Group Last Call (WGLC) for the
following QUIC documents:

* QUIC Transport

* QUIC Loss Detection and Congestion Control

* Using TLS to Secure QUIC

* Version-Independent Properties of QUIC

* HTTP/3

* QPACK Header Compression for HTTP/3

The WGLC will run for four weeks, ending on 8 July 2020.

As a reminder, we have been operating under the Late-Stage Process; see
In theory, this means that the contents of the drafts above already have
consensus. However, the Chairs would like to actively reaffirm that
consensus and start the process of wider review through a formal WGLC.

Please review the documents above and open issues for your review comments
in our repository at https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts. You may also
send comments to quic@ietf.org.

Issues raised during WGLC will be handled in accordance with the Late-Stage
Process defined in the Contribution Guidelines (see link above). Please
note that design issues that revisit a topic where there's already declared
consensus (see
need to provide compelling reasons to warrant reopening the discussion.

As part of this WGLC, we seek consensus on the remaining open design issue
#3661 “Include epoch in the AAD or the nonce?” (
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3661). The proposed resolution
for this issue is to close with no action, which means that the drafts
above already reflect this emerging consensus.

Subject to the feedback received during this WGLC, a subsequent smaller
WGLC may be run in the near future to confirm any changes to the drafts
made between now and then.

The Applicability and Manageability drafts have some dependencies on the
core drafts, so we'll run separate WGLCs for them.


Lars, Lucas and Mark
QUIC WG Chairs