Re: [TLS] TLS 1.2 Long-term Support Profile draft posted

Peter Gutmann <pgut001@cs.auckland.ac.nz> Fri, 18 March 2016 08:59 UTC

Return-Path: <pgut001@cs.auckland.ac.nz>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C1F712D793 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 01:59:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=auckland.ac.nz
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Y9NJc9zTpSfo for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 01:59:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx4.auckland.ac.nz (mx4.auckland.ac.nz [130.216.125.248]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F3DB12D769 for <tls@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 01:59:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=auckland.ac.nz; i=@auckland.ac.nz; q=dns/txt; s=mail; t=1458291543; x=1489827543; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=STy3UqdLXM1bGNdoXv2IHZ45T5LD3V6Z7W8sGJZtDig=; b=Bpu5k6T5d4rQiXIMLflVT2jB/Vk5o3yd+f8lDgYa5lnTDtee1Yq7lPJ0 7Emwr2KpeJaYgW7ws0Ax3KFxX3daUQGgxTw2f+i6Vg/1w0MULNDY0t58I lrMvlgR8AaCynFV36ZtAP96szN2Rbbn6Ys2TJQ+pZmvnTEDW0wXcefwya U3gtdEw7dA2HwyiiUoQr0PYkmp5VO25Msv/zzOi/3hlfa17CxPdPAVWkr CQRVk6KFUMtwr5T7+g8+FCWm9tFAeFSL50XOaaXfvbmG0rSyIohWw0/FX IFuAh9i90QYojMLjOMUVP/7Iol1m6lhp/t+uSuz+TBApKRNTVIllWqZhu w==;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.24,354,1454929200"; d="scan'208";a="75064031"
X-Ironport-HAT: MAIL-SERVERS - $RELAYED
X-Ironport-Source: 130.216.4.106 - Outgoing - Outgoing
Received: from uxchange10-fe2.uoa.auckland.ac.nz ([130.216.4.106]) by mx4-int.auckland.ac.nz with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-SHA; 18 Mar 2016 21:59:01 +1300
Received: from UXCN10-TDC05.UoA.auckland.ac.nz ([169.254.9.241]) by uxchange10-fe2.UoA.auckland.ac.nz ([130.216.4.106]) with mapi id 14.03.0266.001; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 21:59:01 +1300
From: Peter Gutmann <pgut001@cs.auckland.ac.nz>
To: Wan-Teh Chang <wtc@google.com>
Thread-Topic: [TLS] TLS 1.2 Long-term Support Profile draft posted
Thread-Index: AdF/gGiJXC2ZI/lER3iVToFYg5p2ev//VvcAgAOQ/pw=
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 08:59:00 +0000
Message-ID: <9A043F3CF02CD34C8E74AC1594475C73F4C25E7E@uxcn10-tdc05.UoA.auckland.ac.nz>
References: <9A043F3CF02CD34C8E74AC1594475C73F4C2374E@uxcn10-tdc05.UoA.auckland.ac.nz>, <CALTJjxEE_gG73F3JiRFzAO63-NZ0ixz_TpBCH91t5EbjQuG7iQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALTJjxEE_gG73F3JiRFzAO63-NZ0ixz_TpBCH91t5EbjQuG7iQ@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-NZ, en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-NZ
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.6.2.2]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/6dBOpO10pMV65pyB-UZeVRPCKco>
Cc: "<tls@ietf.org>" <tls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [TLS] TLS 1.2 Long-term Support Profile draft posted
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 08:59:05 -0000

Wan-Teh Chang <wtc@google.com>; writes:

>This is the procedure specified in PKCS #1 v2.1 (RFC 3447), Section 8.2.2,
>with the additional requirement that the comparison in Step 4 be constant-
>time, right?

Good catch, thanks!  I've added it to the draft.

Peter.