Re: [TLS] TLS 1.3 -> TLS 2.0?
Colm MacCárthaigh <colm@allcosts.net> Sat, 03 September 2016 16:12 UTC
Return-Path: <colm@allcosts.net>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6A8F12D50B for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 3 Sep 2016 09:12:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.093
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.093 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SUBJ_ALL_CAPS=1.506] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=allcosts-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zRDgYrjZsUQy for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 3 Sep 2016 09:12:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw0-x234.google.com (mail-yw0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 11DA912D0C1 for <tls@ietf.org>; Sat, 3 Sep 2016 09:12:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yw0-x234.google.com with SMTP id l8so18697505ywb.0 for <tls@ietf.org>; Sat, 03 Sep 2016 09:12:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=allcosts-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=dhDpnciTTMh7uORKZZ+9YGABRWjh18Wz+E0wvlpgce4=; b=sRoSs4LPvcxdG5aMweMYdc4ML2owZArSpjkxAWOHOPGreFCXea8ifDVrdKsL+JcNpd PCgco2WmT1ZheCx4rF0SI/dkRZ3Dd0IU0bV8ZdL3RSzNExKviTrZwebVVW0wBbBhkjvb 9Ea2hAdANXfl8F1RfVxo+ZK2CBDkyAYNR3QEVzsg+gnQs1eJkUjpJ7Vnhqh9/sIy/0p2 qMxtk+GgxwDFcIpztqkssfOVpLx/QlLInpSMBNN4NMLHMaJ+lu8FymNspmFH/vlXUMCf VxbqJBXUZVxPBF3cCnNrFI7eCcgXPWL18Bf7zxwnNIrVLgu2VKn17Ybfy299VReZ4Vvq UbJQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=dhDpnciTTMh7uORKZZ+9YGABRWjh18Wz+E0wvlpgce4=; b=hM0lUxwInMjcqpNZJCi7wJ9RuzU+fVz+xvtU2a02BG2+upC0DdR3tFfxrRncHS+W5l Ug6QXRia93Z/EcE9su1TkQ9YnJj7NOBnC7JHXoq/UotF4YbvvIdcf+wcP035QH8igCud mDAukU/NYZSikCb7YCvHMBJwNrYwOujL1xL+2fMDNsBUIMM0KG+bJ7OU2D9JT+N1LHES NKOLfyGxGPdT7u+zmHjkx47UquaSC+zpQa3rCSTq88Ua+nOknjjgZH8y02kS3OcLd4lY MxeRLlbVRNoJH5D1akgXB7hD0I5wRX9cNGW0C/F/wkLQgQ3OmIlEYphHO6BIUSO6Xtvl 7uVA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwOHTbKbRHhYZg6kWCD8okUoZkr8CZKTNpgRFadXNScb9KY+NEeSoAEL2cGcTkJ4Y+OhIInFe0KMA+NZpA==
X-Received: by 10.13.241.199 with SMTP id a190mr21825184ywf.141.1472919126247; Sat, 03 Sep 2016 09:12:06 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.129.45.215 with HTTP; Sat, 3 Sep 2016 09:12:05 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <201608301419.33620.davemgarrett@gmail.com>
References: <201608301419.33620.davemgarrett@gmail.com>
From: Colm MacCárthaigh <colm@allcosts.net>
Date: Sat, 03 Sep 2016 09:12:05 -0700
Message-ID: <CAAF6GDcvjLbPyWNxf_o_q-KTFcG0azEXHh7vn-yvn-wdt4Ec9Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dave Garrett <davemgarrett@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c0327204decad053b9cb5bd"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/6lNZynt3Jok5-KDDrMXY7verElw>
Cc: "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [TLS] TLS 1.3 -> TLS 2.0?
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Sep 2016 16:12:08 -0000
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 11:19 AM, Dave Garrett <davemgarrett@gmail.com> wrote: > I think it's time we just renamed TLS 1.3 to TLS 2.0. +0.7 -- Colm
- Re: [TLS] TLS 1.3 -> TLS 2.0? Andrei Popov
- Re: [TLS] TLS 1.3 -> TLS 2.0? Peter Gutmann
- [TLS] TLS 1.3 -> TLS 2.0? Dave Garrett
- Re: [TLS] TLS 1.3 -> TLS 2.0? Xiaoyin Liu
- Re: [TLS] TLS 1.3 -> TLS 2.0? Dave Garrett
- Re: [TLS] TLS 1.3 -> TLS 2.0? Hubert Kario
- Re: [TLS] TLS 1.3 -> TLS 2.0? Erik Nygren
- Re: [TLS] TLS 1.3 -> TLS 2.0? Rob Stradling
- Re: [TLS] TLS 1.3 -> TLS 2.0? Xiaoyin Liu
- Re: [TLS] TLS 1.3 -> TLS 2.0? Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos
- Re: [TLS] TLS 1.3 -> TLS 2.0? Julien ÉLIE
- Re: [TLS] TLS 1.3 -> TLS 2.0? Peter Gutmann
- Re: [TLS] TLS 1.3 -> TLS 2.0? Hubert Kario
- Re: [TLS] TLS 1.3 -> TLS 2.0? Xiaoyin Liu
- Re: [TLS] TLS 1.3 -> TLS 2.0? Hubert Kario
- Re: [TLS] TLS 1.3 -> TLS 2.0? Daniel Kahn Gillmor
- Re: [TLS] TLS 1.3 -> TLS 2.0? Salz, Rich
- Re: [TLS] TLS 1.3 -> TLS 2.0? Yoav Nir
- Re: [TLS] TLS 1.3 -> TLS 2.0? =JeffH
- Re: [TLS] TLS 1.3 -> TLS 2.0? Brian Sniffen
- Re: [TLS] TLS 1.3 -> TLS 2.0? Andrei Popov
- Re: [TLS] TLS 1.3 -> TLS 2.0? Yoav Nir
- Re: [TLS] TLS 1.3 -> TLS 2.0? Dave Garrett
- Re: [TLS] TLS 1.3 -> TLS 2.0? Bill Frantz
- Re: [TLS] TLS 1.3 -> TLS 2.0? Nick Sullivan
- Re: [TLS] TLS 1.3 -> TLS 2.0? Erik Nygren
- Re: [TLS] TLS 1.3 -> TLS 2.0? Dave Garrett
- Re: [TLS] TLS 1.3 -> TLS 2.0? Richard Barnes
- Re: [TLS] TLS 1.3 -> TLS 2.0? Dave Garrett
- Re: [TLS] TLS 1.3 -> TLS 2.0? Eric Mill
- Re: [TLS] TLS 1.3 -> TLS 2.0? Judson Wilson
- Re: [TLS] TLS 1.3 -> TLS 2.0? Adam Caudill
- Re: [TLS] TLS 1.3 -> TLS 2.0? Dave Garrett
- Re: [TLS] TLS 1.3 -> TLS 2.0? Yoav Nir
- Re: [TLS] TLS 1.3 -> TLS 2.0? Joseph Lorenzo Hall
- Re: [TLS] TLS 1.3 -> TLS 2.0? Peter Gutmann
- Re: [TLS] TLS 1.3 -> TLS 2.0? Colm MacCárthaigh