IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TLS] Publication of draft-rhrd-tls-tls13-visibility-00

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Mon, 23 October 2017 18:29 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 098C7139A5A for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Oct 2017 11:29:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ioz1fzxTJuZt for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Oct 2017 11:29:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9001:583::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8FF7F137C4A for <tls@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Oct 2017 11:29:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0050093.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0050093.ppops.net-00190b01. (8.16.0.21/8.16.0.21) with SMTP id v9NIQohq001881; Mon, 23 Oct 2017 19:29:29 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=8cLm4IB61vMWHL17GIiF8OxgPTWUtlplnaDelOkOCtc=; b=nA7N3ish4yzk7r/BioFoYZSV8dPVBpDNcfzyiCD57/CNTlmV2pcfVwS+7Q+dfpgGzjSH 7SYfdp+cbsnsYFGVTNyhp0nR/rvmf4IW2PMdKQriBFPDOn/jTDpBe51T6QSGvU7EKkNh NpcOhlIZpIgy+KOdEcIOpSSOTht5shmQgn3peYyLBwn8A51+t+qiZ5eDpAwcjxGoQ1gN axxFoJT+HiZ47qFem0ZtGA+MAMcfwYARImciLbIgSubDkLw6068sKfQyLJE06H8WDz7C redLOMJBxJjGWBQDY8B4netMKYoItidxOJGDZl+uRfdkLEH94esIo0VzIPHqpSrVGnjx PA==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint1 (prod-mail-ppoint1.akamai.com [184.51.33.18]) by m0050093.ppops.net-00190b01. with ESMTP id 2dqwgkqhc5-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 23 Oct 2017 19:29:29 +0100
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint1.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint1.akamai.com (8.16.0.21/8.16.0.21) with SMTP id v9NIQGk5012069; Mon, 23 Oct 2017 14:29:28 -0400
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.32]) by prod-mail-ppoint1.akamai.com with ESMTP id 2dr1jue92t-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 23 Oct 2017 14:29:27 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.101) by usma1ex-dag1mb3.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.103) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1263.5; Mon, 23 Oct 2017 14:29:26 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) by usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) with mapi id 15.00.1263.000; Mon, 23 Oct 2017 14:29:27 -0400
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: "Ackermann, Michael" <MAckermann@bcbsm.com>, Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
CC: "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [TLS] Publication of draft-rhrd-tls-tls13-visibility-00
Thread-Index: AQHTO71yMz3yJYxp1UWiK0P85Z38q6LqPDwAgAFTKoCAAAWQgIAAANmAgAABFQCAAAA7gIAAAPWAgAADKYCAAALXgIAABTeAgAACs4CAAAEIAIAABEWAgAAZu4CAAAV4gIAAVLoAgAD/VwCAACX8gIAABAMAgAAHdQCAAASJAIADZUoAgAAIFICAACFZAIAAB4qAgAD5KwCAABI3gIAAC5wAgAABKICAAAOBgIAAAU8AgAANI4CAAAQJAIAAB4AAgAAE24A=
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2017 18:29:27 +0000
Message-ID: <8E5E414B-0789-4724-BCD6-04816447A401@akamai.com>
References: <7E6C8F1F-D341-456B-9A48-79FA7FEC0BC1@gmail.com> <a599d6ad-54db-e525-17d6-6ea882880021@akamai.com> <71e75d23f4544735a9731c4ec3dc7048@venafi.com> <3D2E3E26-B2B9-4B04-9704-0BBEE2E2A8F7@akamai.com> <000501d348e5$1f273450$5d759cf0$@equio.com> <70837127-37AB-4132-9535-4A0EB072BA41@akamai.com> <e8417cc424fe4bf3b240416dfffd807a@venafi.com> <B11A4F30-2F87-4310-A2F0-397582E78E1D@akamai.com> <fd12a8a8c29e4c7f9e9192e1a1d972d6@venafi.com> <D2CAAA44-339E-4B41-BCE0-865C76B50E2F@akamai.com> <d76828f02fc34287a961eba21901247b@venafi.com> <56687FEC-508F-4457-83CC-7C379387240D@akamai.com> <c1c0d010293c449481f8751c3b85d6ae@venafi.com> <4167392E-07FB-46D5-9FBC-4773881BFD2C@akamai.com> <3d5a0c1aab3e4ceb85ff631f8365618f@venafi.com> <E84889BB-08B3-4A3A-AE3A-687874B16440@akamai.com> <CAPBBiVQvtQbD4j3ofpCmG63MEyRWF15VL90NOTjeNqUOiyo6xg@mail.gmail.com> <9013424B-4F6D-4185-9BFD-EC454FF80F22@akamai.com> <CY4PR14MB1368CBA562220D9A3604F0FFD7430@CY4PR14MB1368.namprd14.prod.outlook.com> <2741e833-c0d1-33ca-0ad3-b71122220bc5@cs.tcd.ie> <CY4PR14MB136835A3306DEEFCA89D3C2DD7430@CY4PR14MB1368.namprd14.prod.outlook.com> <31F5A73E-F37E-40D8-AA7D-8BB861692FED@akamai.com> <13592ABB-BA71-4DF9-BEE4-1E0C3ED50598@gmail.com> <2EE9CB23-AEDA-4155-BF24-EBC70CD302EF@fugue.com> <CY4PR14MB136816569A2AE2A9760C6E08D7410@CY4PR14MB1368.namprd14.prod.outlook.com> <557F43AC-A236-47BB-8C51-EDD37D09D5CB@fugue.com> <CY4PR14MB13684F18AD75F4AE767CE35CD7460@CY4PR14MB1368.namprd14.prod.outlook.com> <57CFBA2A-E878-47B0-8284-35369D4DA2DF@fugue.com> <CY4PR14MB13680B6D5726D940C4C51B4BD7460@CY4PR14MB1368.namprd14.prod.outlook.com> <0D75E20C-135D-45BC-ABE4-5C737B7491C9@akamai.com> <CY4PR14MB1368378B42A6C46B27F5EF01D7460@CY4PR14MB1368.namprd14.prod.outlook.com> <2AC16F9E-C745-43AD-82C1-D3953D51816C@fugue.com> <CY4PR14MB1368895DD0D72286635E4E83D7460@CY4PR14MB1368.namprd14.prod.outlook.com> <E37A3920-D7E3-4C94-89D0-6D3ECDEBCFF6@fugue.com> <CY4PR14MB13687B405BA0EDC62F4371AAD7460@CY4PR14MB1368.namprd14.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <CY4PR14MB13687B405BA0EDC62F4371AAD7460@CY4PR14MB1368.namprd14.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.27.0.171010
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.19.35.171]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_8E5E414B07894724BCD604816447A401akamaicom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2017-10-23_09:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1707230000 definitions=main-1710230260
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2017-10-23_09:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1707230000 definitions=main-1710230260
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/6oi9tr65Bo9_IDoY2vn799JoWUc>
Subject: Re: [TLS] Publication of draft-rhrd-tls-tls13-visibility-00
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2017 18:29:36 -0000

  *   I would put the comment  that anyone or any industry is attempting to lay costs for anything off on IETF,  in the same unfortunate bucket.

Do I misunderstand what you meant by this comment?
                It is a huge proposition requiring change to virtually every platform and application.    Not to mention all the management,  monitoring and security platforms. It would be very expensive and time consuming.

Or this one?
Modifying Server,  application and logging infrastructure is a huge, expensive proposition,  that executive management would not be receptive to at all.   Not to mention the logistics to follow if they were.

Or this one?
                I believe his point was that because we do not move quickly,  we need to prepare as much in advance as possible, and assure that the base protocols we know we will be using in the future,  do not put us in the position of having to do things that are generally not possible,  such as make significant application or protocol changes.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email