Re: [TLS] Post-handshake Finished when rejecting a CertificateRequest
Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Tue, 02 August 2016 10:40 UTC
Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9E9512B049 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 03:40:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dhFlwNuPh89U for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 03:40:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x234.google.com (mail-wm0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D1F4A12D513 for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 03:40:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x234.google.com with SMTP id i5so283424123wmg.0 for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 02 Aug 2016 03:40:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Avp9Z3pW7X+FKHCh4jUyC0lax/AABG/p9gmjooYo3Ls=; b=f0AWgxMQmJi8Ve/Lsq+irGfb7WkozI5BoyHKOUrEkFzGfMj1XqnzTmOF6vOaOY0HEo zIqSwf15HO1n2J5rwEnhb+nWeePpql/nEYr2MTvSvQco+n91kFwKQaP9+uMxPTib7QGy eKajMTOVMx9FBgUbDrQRXZF8/6rRFMURtN1TQlyoKTquGUpF/72pTmCjPfBYOf248PE1 H0w1mUwwpqK5+CPmuWHIKcYYV2PRQH5Vfc0WCVpN8ifrE5zquMrstYu4b8sId0rMrRqZ cDsaJsjf4e8Yq/mCIBukfyXl9nyuYgCoWzYDx9CTzRuASEtaxm3wiICZ9ATPWDr2xF1z MyFQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Avp9Z3pW7X+FKHCh4jUyC0lax/AABG/p9gmjooYo3Ls=; b=Vtdoo+WPrG6U+S5HkOFHmD3NZ4CyVXRwZ18zbyp8F+3mnweEQClerUXmlhIY2cx9Uq 9+7EI2CPTWkXqK/Y4sQT55b0M+Z7Zadjvn9drXBL6PyorqKZukeSbepyZ7a64jyg4S+D GrGTqsjtYZswn9ZDnxuMFAXkobPyQmaMD1GXbXMQFOilbk8r8P6NAxMiVN+xxzsSg0La kdtz+PIYcT1G+oZDbR5fEID+F5AKjoSYjsSjj63rsx8omzaRd6R4yVfr0YAxftQCddja TYH0p0yFNCjedz2w+Ztda2FeU62oOD54zfYvnHXzWjoo9pYyVfFfNgTq++HU6OmFsBef Az+A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoouvyGDzTddnkoBOsd3O5PBfitsjw33INtmkTMT9PMG+kro0mvDVytLqN/yLqKcre7QxS+Kmjs/JOzpMI2Q==
X-Received: by 10.194.77.142 with SMTP id s14mr53962885wjw.77.1470134409366; Tue, 02 Aug 2016 03:40:09 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.28.167.150 with HTTP; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 03:40:08 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20160802074854.GA21071@LK-Perkele-V2.elisa-laajakaista.fi>
References: <CABkgnnVUHmqDjkRn3LaV=Bz7_X_Y4oShkSyXg8h5E9=bKoLAog@mail.gmail.com> <20160802074854.GA21071@LK-Perkele-V2.elisa-laajakaista.fi>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2016 20:40:08 +1000
Message-ID: <CABkgnnWMoiM4B_5Vd-qyd4f2_59FqybbHt3eziRAdM9U8BBPKA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ilari Liusvaara <ilariliusvaara@welho.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/7d4vKYlfP2OYS5aOiwCSGg3L-9E>
Cc: "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [TLS] Post-handshake Finished when rejecting a CertificateRequest
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2016 10:40:13 -0000
On 2 August 2016 at 17:48, Ilari Liusvaara <ilariliusvaara@welho.com> wrote: > Also, what exact base key does that Finished use? Client's current > traffic secret at the beginning of the Finished (the sequence of > traffic secrets is the same client and server, but the values may > be out of sync.)? Presumably it's the traffic_secret_N that is active at the start of the sequence of messages; also presumably, the sequence of messages cannot be interrupted by something like a KeyUpdate.
- Re: [TLS] Post-handshake Finished when rejecting … Martin Thomson
- Re: [TLS] Post-handshake Finished when rejecting … Eric Rescorla
- Re: [TLS] Post-handshake Finished when rejecting … Ilari Liusvaara
- Re: [TLS] Post-handshake Finished when rejecting … Ilari Liusvaara
- [TLS] Post-handshake Finished when rejecting a Ce… Martin Thomson