Re: [TLS] Asking for certificate authentication when doing 0-RTT

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Tue, 24 May 2016 21:00 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6064A12D0A6 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 May 2016 14:00:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9hEacWSjDZO3 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 May 2016 14:00:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk0-x22f.google.com (mail-qk0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 77B3412B051 for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 May 2016 14:00:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id n63so21056992qkf.0 for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 May 2016 14:00:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc; bh=6+ZsB5rVvhpPNYl58fySyZOoVhnuK87Mn5XnS8gTing=; b=VKM8GU2VFcrva/itaEGpKWmTuHibIGfbnvLnCtsnxttKcXa8fDCltZr9rh0BkoiNB5 7l/WfVaLZ7yXgoZHpXed/qCG58K3PUF5cMh+3UaoC6UyQN2qRrCDFPePYfFlVWi8Ob26 NTLuS0qsEuBTc+QIAH8SMnOr4cV71kF9nx1g5ZcnrV9vw6j1zKzX+jAF8neCNpx6K2gL 5u2VrgGNyteLsg/zQHRZQYBvW7O655YHnLdVU6GfPGHWn37ls0JrpHd9LuUMKwmLd2ZH rpSJOAZvmrYg1Q3WiWR5xxO7iOdEWiW7XZzTeN2HQXbIuX6KgWEWfAzZRRRvXK6OXCx4 RnWA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=6+ZsB5rVvhpPNYl58fySyZOoVhnuK87Mn5XnS8gTing=; b=hcwI/J5yi1p4gCcfuVwz5HQxmeyyxl3ploqUrYVTn0UM7YIF6YlCXWKB234yTJyPoh z4fvnOkT3FFGN76WNSy9TywH87um/EZ122Z3SuNTVwIzCE3ohKbnv5kEvvwjqCQQNCIJ qs2uHsRfD6Fc1bnlij7GB0LjIHfl4R5S4+EtxY2BxG/baFrLMU2LOKKDAjqeQaiuy77X PWT/Welf3L9idOov3l+iTsn002nvq7VS3zjTRchq+tbHfP4pMGHBiL9f+HHxpKRWN1+t 2HpSWiuRHHy+V6DEmgdHu8Igwt9wg6bk+6+gYtvea8Q+hVRIjN18AfU/KRGLsOddkyy1 Vsjg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tKYDH5IG5XcxKOZ0QS8sDGgwFxdXkq5J5dXX3BP+9dSGcSxShcpFA17mm593PHMvrsWAdpdJwZ558pikw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.237.55.73 with SMTP id i67mr232121qtb.94.1464123622547; Tue, 24 May 2016 14:00:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.140.104.70 with HTTP; Tue, 24 May 2016 14:00:22 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20160520194115.GA5467@LK-Perkele-V2.elisa-laajakaista.fi>
References: <CABkgnnXoNT7BBbbHGBMnb3iNwjj4ZVSNavrKgQFG-hiPGw96Bw@mail.gmail.com> <20160520194115.GA5467@LK-Perkele-V2.elisa-laajakaista.fi>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 14:00:22 -0700
Message-ID: <CABkgnnXuhDfFHniHmRO+hk0pgV0UzNvMcgkq9nyPT+bUZkJ9tA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: Ilari Liusvaara <ilariliusvaara@welho.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/7wZTC3F4xxhK_1o_miKqjvo5VWY>
Cc: "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [TLS] Asking for certificate authentication when doing 0-RTT
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 21:00:25 -0000

On 20 May 2016 at 12:41, Ilari Liusvaara <ilariliusvaara@welho.com> wrote:
> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 10:10:29AM -0400, Martin Thomson wrote:
>> I just posted this:
>>
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-thomson-tls-0rtt-and-certs/
>>
>> It's fairly self explanatory.  The idea is to create a way to signal
>> that the client wants the server to re-authenticate itself, even if it
>> successful in using a pre-shared key.
>
> - How is the capability signaled? New flag bits in session ticket
>   for these ciphersuites?


I just uploaded -01 that corrects this oversight.

I have raised https://github.com/martinthomson/tls-0rtt-and-certs/issues/1
which tracks whether certificates might change.