Re: [TLS] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-barnes-tls-pake-00.txt

Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx> Mon, 16 April 2018 19:01 UTC

Return-Path: <rlb@ipv.sx>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B74012EA97 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 12:01:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.909
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, T_DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ipv-sx.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gqmuqZ0sX6aQ for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 12:01:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ot0-x22e.google.com (mail-ot0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c0f::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB0A212EAA4 for <tls@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 12:01:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ot0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id p2-v6so1796614otf.3 for <tls@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 12:01:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ipv-sx.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=cz0fytVcCmfNu6DzEBztg0PLx2rZB9Cr9igOTBKT1bg=; b=2S5U9jybc/kEjvWcpkaqtZgSAEacLkfcU7zoJqXOR3TvXL8ObLlMst9VBC4NzL+inp gCGJVLWUwAgCp9DgOxn3llhFeEGmURf+SivD2C+VfOqyvb9qtwdTbPuN7/Bp5FuFMCI+ vxXw+O/gE77jdWdlqGiwca9gmk0KD11sUF8XXcFsJJPIDG1mIZrg01YNtCW8HV6NJTa4 4LV8Apr3vV8iLBiSRJDhntLjExI2GMYtbYpAva1zG7t86tKlL45by9+7pkzfMBoraQa7 1YWWI7aOhWAe/Q8YYw3yS71HRMrXdSnauhdo3RUyl565E+tmeiIolFjMQ6mtM2XSzAW4 i+tw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=cz0fytVcCmfNu6DzEBztg0PLx2rZB9Cr9igOTBKT1bg=; b=RMOBlp5MUfBSVrGetjf/mZalbk0UUnTzW3CDk1J32yzfKCGpkKIz6FEtnG8sZtKSoJ G6hCJ8fEdw4LJe51cKXHu0gPieFkGjs/aMPswe0GHE+wU0inQiWwaNXtfTRLorkfSHpk bXzQLAK6iSHNaaNC42DqTASbpTFCAjcN22nF5U9k5MqrQDk7IXewGsIaWnopt1eHqSVW 777kbuwgBBmxa0+HdAfFzNu04KrquCOkenEt+IuEHxYD4x41KCYjM779CvR5RTyHYLU3 nX121QgPdrRqooEQpmjOsV2MToRIc/DsUTD1SabmT1bSJV1HbuwPBSqz2V9W42gFaIF9 TMZQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALQs6tCt9fzJL8rR0jiAfUmyLH4uSBsr11PgXpSUoZTQivDFrYlH/+50 aA9SxhSuf2fHIrsMJLgeo4CkVpG3MPHv6NsaP6YDxw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx4/N1EWqoFvMqYCVwc7iXzgmVu8AHKgYapASwLCyaSGm+r2foy1S8IILN8qZcMQeVplRQTgSDDfzgHNeXvq6PGw=
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:1920:: with SMTP id j32-v6mr11792464ota.383.1523905282011; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 12:01:22 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.201.90.67 with HTTP; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 12:01:21 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CACykbs0by3HLAHT-Fss+ZU9S+5PW-Y4XdgYQYEthG0hhr6sKMg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <152345795593.1972.17855870949078823595.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAL02cgSOA-asdvyFNLLpcN59qeVjwQU9F2f=mgM9Y_B0Xv4rmg@mail.gmail.com> <140080C241BAA1419B58F093108F9EDC1DBF718C@UK-MAL-MBOX-01.dyson.global.corp> <CAL02cgS7dJVrMwiE9UrJKmaxW1v876et0Qg_S8MKf5FbSZjekg@mail.gmail.com> <140080C241BAA1419B58F093108F9EDC1DBFD7C7@UK-MAL-MBOX-02.dyson.global.corp> <CACykbs355twK=y8t6zmUgvSqAVndYb_+fG2DOOyYPTz+-+vwOw@mail.gmail.com> <CAL02cgSdeR4JJH-ROheS60z0hiGkoZVgk6Um=K3ohd5oh9261w@mail.gmail.com> <CACykbs0by3HLAHT-Fss+ZU9S+5PW-Y4XdgYQYEthG0hhr6sKMg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx>
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2018 15:01:21 -0400
Message-ID: <CAL02cgSRHtMXVuiYtT_G_Fmp99ji1eqHYp54jy+Vxt0HQRXBeg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jonathan Hoyland <jonathan.hoyland@gmail.com>
Cc: Tony Putman <Tony.Putman@dyson.com>, "<tls@ietf.org>" <tls@ietf.org>, Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000000188fa0569fbd975"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/7xwGVI55ygh7XbW09u5S9t9dkuU>
Subject: Re: [TLS] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-barnes-tls-pake-00.txt
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2018 19:01:39 -0000

> That's correct, however if I have a guess of the password can I not just
> try and connect using that password?
> If my guess is correct then the connection will succeed, whereas if my
> guess is incorrect then the connection will fail.
>

Sure, but aren't you going to have that with any password-authenticated
protocol?

--Richard



> I'm assuming here that the salt is public, because salts in general do not
> have confidentiality guarantees (otherwise they stretch the metaphor and
> become pepper).
> (I also assume that the client identity can be derived from observing a
> previous session, and that the server identity can be identified through
> probing.)
>
> Regards,
>
> Jonathan
>
>
>
> On Mon, 16 Apr 2018 at 19:43 Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx> wrote:
>
>> Hey Jonathan,
>>
>> Thanks for the comments.  I've implemented them in my working copy of the
>> draft, and in my implementation in mint.  I have also changed it over to
>> use SPAKE2+; I agree with Tony that this is necessary to guard against
>> server compromise.
>>
>> https://github.com/bifurcation/tls-pake/commit/
>> a9f097c3bfe43cf50001e1a340c7e2e693850d4b
>> https://github.com/bifurcation/mint/pull/193
>>
>> With regard to security properties: I don't think it's correct that an
>> active attacker can do online password guessing.  Everything that is
>> revealed on the wire is blinded with fresh, per-connection entropy, and
>> thus doesn't reveal anything about the password.
>>
>> --Richard
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 7:52 AM, Jonathan Hoyland <
>> jonathan.hoyland@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Richard,
>>>
>>> A few nits.
>>>
>>> * In the introduction you have the sentence
>>> > DISCLAIMER: This is a work-in-progress draft of MLS and has not yet
>>>
>>>    seen significant security analysis.
>>>
>>> Iiuc this draft has no connection to MLS, and this is a typo.
>>>
>>>  * In the setup you define
>>>
>>> > o  A DH group "G" of order "p*h", with "p" a large prime
>>>
>>> and
>>>
>>> > o  A password "p"
>>>
>>>
>>> The variable "p" has two different meanings, which is a bit confusing,
>>> especially later on.
>>>
>>>  * The document doesn't explicitly state that X and Y need to be
>>> non-zero.
>>> The requirement is in "I-D.irtf-cfrg-spake2", but it would be nice if
>>> the warning was carried through.
>>>
>>> * In terms of security properties, iiuc an active adversary can do
>>> online password guessing attacks, but a passive adversary cannot derive the
>>> password from observing the messages. If that is the case perhaps a warning
>>> about rate-limiting connection attempts is appropriate.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Jonathan
>>>
>>> On Mon, 16 Apr 2018 at 10:50 Tony Putman <Tony.Putman@dyson.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Richard,
>>>>
>>>> I don't think that you can protect against server compromise with
>>>> SPAKE2. The server can store w*N as you suggest, but it also has to store
>>>> w*M because it must calculate y*(T-w*M). An attacker that learns w*M and
>>>> w*N from a compromised server can then impersonate a client.
>>>>
>>>> The rest of your comments I agree with (though they are not all
>>>> addressed in the updated draft).
>>>>
>>>> Tony
>>>>
>>>> > From: Richard Barnes [mailto:rlb@ipv.sx]
>>>> > Sent: 13 April 2018 19:50
>>>> >
>>>> > Hey Tony,
>>>> >
>>>> > Thanks for the comments.  Hopefully we can adapt this document to
>>>> tick more boxes for you :)
>>>> > Since I had noticed some other errors in the document (e.g., figures
>>>> not rendering properly),
>>>> > I went ahead and submitted a new version that takes these comments
>>>> into account.
>>>> >
>>>> > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-barnes-tls-pake-01
>>>> >
>>>> > Some responses inline below.
>>>>
>>>> Dyson Technology Limited, company number 01959090, Tetbury Hill,
>>>> Malmesbury, SN16 0RP, UK.
>>>> This message is intended solely for the addressee and may contain
>>>> confidential information. If you have received this message in error,
>>>> please immediately and permanently delete it, and do not use, copy or
>>>> disclose the information contained in this message or in any attachment.
>>>> Dyson may monitor email traffic data and content for security &
>>>> training.
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> TLS mailing list
>>>> TLS@ietf.org
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
>>>>
>>>
>>