IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TLS] Minutes from Tuesday

Bodo Moeller <bmoeller@acm.org> Tue, 21 October 2014 16:41 UTC

Return-Path: <SRS0=D4s1=7M=acm.org=bmoeller@srs.kundenserver.de>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E3921A8A7E for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 09:41:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.938
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.938 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 13hXfjnSckoq for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 09:41:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.kundenserver.de (mout.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.130]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8AC081A8A7B for <TLS@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 09:41:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yh0-f54.google.com (mail-yh0-f54.google.com [209.85.213.54]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mreue005) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0MMJjd-1XmOrq3pID-0085fk; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 18:41:44 +0200
Received: by mail-yh0-f54.google.com with SMTP id 29so1993685yhl.27 for <TLS@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 09:41:42 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.236.203.114 with SMTP id e78mr52239685yho.47.1413909702790; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 09:41:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.170.194.15 with HTTP; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 09:41:42 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <2A0EFB9C05D0164E98F19BB0AF3708C71D3A8C4AA6@USMBX1.msg.corp.akamai.com>
References: <2A0EFB9C05D0164E98F19BB0AF3708C71D3A8C4AA6@USMBX1.msg.corp.akamai.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 18:41:42 +0200
Message-ID: <CADMpkcKM222eU+49U=aNBvq0QRF+C9wAunOW1rBcsJdnC2gxKw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Bodo Moeller <bmoeller@acm.org>
To: "tls@ietf.org" <TLS@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e0158c7c4945a610505f18197"
X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:A5CcTvCvPv1sWfUF8FZyXNVKe6eHPq34fezgs5kd3Bb 5KejvuvA0q2fQ8IyZ4wgWFlt/MUvECs1MToDG3Iy5i227epWoo u7Wt+SW6VUGzDiKPZ1wuPx3w5gyFmoHOoqJKbh7JzDytJggpT6 CDMcBAu/BLOB58ypv9zYlzIxVdOSX+0ScTL44AFoBSH8/PP9X9 BCATx/MN8yqjmydAG8nQ3Mn8DkeWVlA/d6t/4S7DVi9cISQjD1 9VT/4bYYOdmgRQqx3YUmmGByXVy7i2/Cwk8fSgPg513hiN0ect ROzVOkgybcNKk/hOaVYkW0cnD7gvd4uNpI3LmIxsqTkRyhxxFV DRm4ANE93aMQYpkG48VFo8lhZ0DcLfq84gGzohh3/Nt7kRhjgU Ry/nu4aH7/KEQf0XLkVGLsOPJxtPQ0mgXqQlzvjbSpKHNWaaNc /psoU
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/7ziT069l2-t8SWh2T7IWuOp4oyQ
Subject: Re: [TLS] Minutes from Tuesday
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 16:41:48 -0000

Salz, Rich <rsalz@akamai.com>:

Here’s the draft minutes for today’s interim.  Please post corrections to
> the list.
>


> Discussion of RC4 draft.  Andrei via phone. Room strongly supports
> prohibiting RC4. Discussion about being able to address concerns raised by
> a few. Chair will close discussion and move it forward. Sean to include
> text about “just upgrade to TLS 1.2” as we considered alternatives and
> rejected them in his shepard notes or equivalent. Mention that youtube
> encodes video streams using RC4 only.
>

That's not right: YouTube video streams currently can use two cipher
suites, TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 and TLS_RSA_WITH_RC4_128_SHA. The
interoperability problem mentioned in the meeting was that
TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (without ECDHE) isn't a supported cipher
suite in Firefox, and RC4 is RC4;
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1029179.

Bodo

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email