[TLS] Re: [EXT] Re: WG Adoption Call for ML-KEM Post-Quantum Key Agreement for TLS 1.3

["Bellebaum, Thomas" <[e-mail]>]

> It might be fine to adopt this only for publication as Experimental.

There is actually another option for those that just want a stable reference.
Quoting from draft-ietf-tls-rfc8447bis:

> D:  Indicates that the item is discouraged.  This marking could be
>     used to identify mechanisms that might result in problems if they
>     are used, such as a weak cryptographic algorithm or a mechanism
>     that might cause interoperability problems in deployment.  When
>     marking a registry entry as “D”, either the References or the
>     Comments Column MUST include sufficient information to determine
>     why the marking has been applied.  Implementers SHOULD consult the
>     linked references associated with the item to determine the
>     conditions under which it SHOULD NOT or MUST NOT be used.

I believe this captures my main concerns quite well.
In particular, I believe it conveys the point that absent very specific considerations (and I still have not heard of any I consider valid), deploying this is probably a bad idea.

-- TBB