Re: [TLS] Deprecate SHA1 for signatures in TLS 1.3 (was Re: TLS 1.3 draft-07 sneak peek)

mrex@sap.com (Martin Rex) Mon, 13 July 2015 16:10 UTC

Return-Path: <mrex@sap.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 471C51A8A48 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 09:10:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.551
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.551 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3t2RLEqLE2g3 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 09:10:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpde01.smtp.sap-ag.de (smtpde01.smtp.sap-ag.de [155.56.68.170]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E04691A8A46 for <tls@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 09:10:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail05.wdf.sap.corp (mail05.sap.corp [194.39.131.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtpde01.smtp.sap-ag.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 31CF22A87B; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 18:10:52 +0200 (CEST)
X-purgate-ID: 152705::1436803852-0000413A-52072989/0/0
X-purgate-size: 613
X-purgate: clean
X-purgate: This mail is considered clean (visit http://www.eleven.de for further information)
X-purgate-Ad: Categorized by eleven eXpurgate (R) http://www.eleven.de
X-purgate-type: clean
X-SAP-SPAM-Status: clean
Received: from ld9781.wdf.sap.corp (ld9781.wdf.sap.corp [10.21.82.193]) by mail05.wdf.sap.corp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2224840688; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 18:10:52 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by ld9781.wdf.sap.corp (Postfix, from userid 10159) id 1946D1A1DD; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 18:10:52 +0200 (CEST)
In-Reply-To: <201507131040.35143.davemgarrett@gmail.com>
To: Dave Garrett <davemgarrett@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 18:10:52 +0200
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL125 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Message-Id: <20150713161052.1946D1A1DD@ld9781.wdf.sap.corp>
From: mrex@sap.com
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/8KW9P60oekQmtOqNhX3g470XmpY>
Cc: "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [TLS] Deprecate SHA1 for signatures in TLS 1.3 (was Re: TLS 1.3 draft-07 sneak peek)
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: mrex@sap.com
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 16:10:55 -0000

Dave Garrett wrote:
> On Monday, July 13, 2015 10:30:06 am Martin Rex wrote:
>> Section 7.4.1.4 Hello Extensions and its subsections are clearly
>> IRRELEVANT for a client that does not use Hello Extensions.
> 
> If you want to put it that way, sure, however they are NOT irrelevant
> for a _server_ that does use hello extensions. This is a direct part
> of the TLS 1.2 spec,

That particular MUST in 7.4.1.4.1 is *VOID* because it is incompatible with
rfc2119 section 6.  As it can be easily verified, the behaviour
described in rfc5246 is detrimental to interoperability and security.


-Martin