IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TLS] WGLC: draft-ietf-tls-prohibiting-rc4-00

"Blumenthal, Uri - 0558 - MITLL" <uri@ll.mit.edu> Fri, 08 August 2014 17:14 UTC

Return-Path: <prvs=32978e657e=uri@ll.mit.edu>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 195361B2866 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Aug 2014 10:14:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id huTI_Jh8XRIB for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Aug 2014 10:14:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx2.ll.mit.edu (MX2.LL.MIT.EDU [129.55.12.46]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 698DA1B2860 for <tls@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Aug 2014 10:14:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from LLE2K10-HUB02.mitll.ad.local (LLE2K10-HUB02.mitll.ad.local) by mx2.ll.mit.edu (unknown) with ESMTP id s78HEgEP000710; Fri, 8 Aug 2014 13:14:51 -0400
From: "Blumenthal, Uri - 0558 - MITLL" <uri@ll.mit.edu>
To: "mrex@sap.com" <mrex@sap.com>
Thread-Topic: [TLS] WGLC: draft-ietf-tls-prohibiting-rc4-00
Thread-Index: AQHPsxDzfQ5Gw8dfRUSnLamikTCz3ZvHDu0A///jZYA=
Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2014 17:14:40 +0000
Message-ID: <D00A7D64.189DD%uri@ll.mit.edu>
References: <291878953.27023269.1407506349223.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> <20140808145658.E70281ADFC@ld9781.wdf.sap.corp>
In-Reply-To: <20140808145658.E70281ADFC@ld9781.wdf.sap.corp>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.4.3.140616
x-originating-ip: [172.25.177.187]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha256"; boundary="B_3490348475_57150391"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.12.52, 1.0.27, 0.0.0000 definitions=2014-08-08_05:2014-08-08,2014-08-08,1970-01-01 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=7.0.1-1402240000 definitions=main-1408080205
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/8VEoFV3cZcDMAVD7DkQ4ASwZTVw
Cc: "TLS@ietf.org (tls@ietf.org)" <tls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [TLS] WGLC: draft-ietf-tls-prohibiting-rc4-00
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2014 17:14:55 -0000

>...........I've also seen such
>interop problems with Java (J2SE) client (using nio it seems),
>that will simply not interop with 3DES-EDE (nor AES128-SHA),
>and RC4 is the only alternative that works.

Could you please provide more information on this? What exactly did not
interoperate? And details, please?

Thanks!

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email