[TLS] Re: The TLS-LTS Saga
"Independent Submissions Editor (Eliot Lear)" <rfc-ise@rfc-editor.org> Sun, 30 March 2025 18:36 UTC
Return-Path: <rfc-ise@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: tls@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: tls@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D078A14CA952 for <tls@mail2.ietf.org>; Sun, 30 Mar 2025 11:36:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rfc-editor-org.20230601.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XWIyPUGEN9m4 for <tls@mail2.ietf.org>; Sun, 30 Mar 2025 11:36:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr1-x42e.google.com (mail-wr1-x42e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42e]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B75314CA946 for <tls@ietf.org>; Sun, 30 Mar 2025 11:36:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr1-x42e.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-3912d2c89ecso3390927f8f.2 for <tls@ietf.org>; Sun, 30 Mar 2025 11:36:26 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rfc-editor-org.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1743359785; x=1743964585; darn=ietf.org; h=in-reply-to:from:content-language:references:cc:to:subject :user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=p0e4dvGQgtowNju8nuqFAnxCkl2wBZ+TfQjZXDZwZVQ=; b=E6Xr38EGer4lsV34F41rN6yXfaqFo2Xb1KapEChLjRgSfJHPkjOJFG3uoHMdaU2R5O aGBis2QaRluRmsG2j29Xwu0JhfTx5blVOZaEpwT5pHqAEkTdRZjOZVWncwM+n2ZF5Kfe g3jo7m7o4JhzLhQcajKArJTpROJYOFbHMhW05fsZ07AISP7Y1f0vnyrkutGRa48O59e1 tP3wbm93j6XbrHVGaG2yW6oVY760xVXhMoRDGLyRXdoId19lwqh6uBR4IPh8h7M/dFQF 3gl8NgAw5BiysEZ6rmhUv1CB6h4vxtTeW3vu7eHpWdb7wO/sYXRcC0N7tKi5nso3whqo PcNg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1743359785; x=1743964585; h=in-reply-to:from:content-language:references:cc:to:subject :user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id:x-gm-message-state:from:to :cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=p0e4dvGQgtowNju8nuqFAnxCkl2wBZ+TfQjZXDZwZVQ=; b=hF+OSEgtXDmAFpj3wZXhJDBF6wvUKkhxfiTsZ/p+yzRUTfzxau2H0584nxSFniyGNi SXi76C/cmr9mcY8EXijm3z4dKHijpLqeiNOfabMuoyszKqScyWA+ljSVWTHkgEFLIfdk BD1aYxcQVt9Nu8Jf5ZDaXYybI2fxbEFXEhUuEoC3z4UVZ8TeURfK/pHVKJ048x4XGQTH 3m3ThIBDnwk6PnOFawlezWll1Pif9sN3sazX645julteldK+ffxV85tT7K4l+YP5zU0B YQd0psMSPzsIYukX+cg+KdKP1BW+N+9hSVxrdMtrgd9pbsta89jD3JCzef+TbuQXN36V waUw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yxp/XwrGsFxP72EyNeDlJcbwt6OFgSEWrLyM5G5XdOaIFNZtkP3 pezEml6dCPW/q/i1QqjToY7L/bSNVIVWo56wfHf7bY5uo0+9qJ7h5BRwxzkiNvae9g==
X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncs9Isd1XHzuUDEpbqS/bytaZHGf9IaawISg+B9+vGaqcJvKLFdPMosmy5hSLOf /LyMesuFlO3gXr1MJAMykHU8nT+Y+QmTB75cNtDttxzAYJke9IwAeO/qfDeh59ywZwM/ivBOWpE 4DSOjkGayBVIYS+R1P2M/RryyN+mpN9UQvx/4zYl+vxUcx0x9+aYntTi0R8EYe1x2uQeJIB00hK OzPk6f6R8WPx4EXdf0meGYQNODz8opQF9dSxP7fReKU1USDN6bRZrCGZUAsXsP0DvSAh2NKwIWU 6iwYJiUvUuRg0GXB+K+TdeecvzvQI9ORVxM/cviuUQoY36pucgV0RXIPtbis4HiAh8ZvOTmEjD3 f73iavIfKWA+HbLjyE2ubsHOaVaFqIq7rjJUogR6D
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IE+MLfX8fOwzCztJ3N3f2/SxRmasngA70NspXaOm4dRZqX80mnHWsKwOTZ93CLnhD3IXFe4ZQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:42ca:b0:38f:30a3:51fe with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-39c12117a99mr3763990f8f.42.1743359785121; Sun, 30 Mar 2025 11:36:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPV6:2a02:1210:2c9b:e200:1835:5d1c:bb5f:e943? ([2a02:1210:2c9b:e200:1835:5d1c:bb5f:e943]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ffacd0b85a97d-39c0b663564sm9299586f8f.32.2025.03.30.11.36.24 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 30 Mar 2025 11:36:24 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------c2jz5ZAQsqGIQntYJTbDMM8S"
Message-ID: <aadbfec2-ba16-44cc-9675-f65fdcf3627b@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2025 20:36:24 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
To: Peter Gutmann <pgut001@cs.auckland.ac.nz>, "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
References: <DF6D6A91-6D63-42E2-AAEF-1D6EE27D1CC3@akamai.com> <FAB94BB9-E030-4F20-98FD-C2C1A5C9A28A@akamai.com> <ME0P300MB0713B7AE332E5C1539179695EEA22@ME0P300MB0713.AUSP300.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Content-Language: en-US
From: "Independent Submissions Editor (Eliot Lear)" <rfc-ise@rfc-editor.org>
In-Reply-To: <ME0P300MB0713B7AE332E5C1539179695EEA22@ME0P300MB0713.AUSP300.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Message-ID-Hash: L45TFRT5OIOZHWR6WEVSGBZT53XDBTJI
X-Message-ID-Hash: L45TFRT5OIOZHWR6WEVSGBZT53XDBTJI
X-MailFrom: rfc-ise@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-tls.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [TLS] Re: The TLS-LTS Saga
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/8XMNuj8T4QsWBQfF3TQftYyBZcQ>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:tls-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:tls-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:tls-leave@ietf.org>
RFC 4846 states that you may ask the IAB to review the ISE's decision. If they choose to do so (they don't have to), they may advise the ISE to reconsider. You are welcome to use this route. If the IAB does advise me to reconsider, I certainly will do so. I have made mistakes before. Eliot On 30.03.2025 12:51, Peter Gutmann wrote: > Salz, Rich<rsalz@akamai.com> writes: > >> This isn't right. >> >> We held up on advancing the frozen draft until we thought TLS-LTS was through >> the ISE process. > I pointed this out to the ISE editor but he just ignored it and blocked > publication anyway. > > What's the appeal/review mechanism for getting this misuse of the IETF process > corrected? > > Peter.
- [TLS] The TLS-LTS Saga Peter Gutmann
- [TLS] Re: The TLS-LTS Saga Salz, Rich
- [TLS] Re: The TLS-LTS Saga Salz, Rich
- [TLS] Re: The TLS-LTS Saga Peter Gutmann
- [TLS] Re: The TLS-LTS Saga Independent Submissions Editor (Eliot Lear)