Re: [TLS] OCSP must staple

I believe that draft has been abandoned in favor of:

http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hallambaker-tlsfeature/

Personally, I don’t think this draft is applicable to the TLS WG and would be better suited as an AD sponsored draft.  I know PHB approached me about sponsoring it but I think we both got busy before the end of my term.  I’ve not doubt PHB will at some point approach Stephen/Kathleen about sponsoring it.  If you’re interested in supporting it, sending them a message might help (sec-ads@tools.ietf.org).

spt

On May 28, 2014, at 15:00, Jeremy Rowley <jeremy.rowley@digicert.com> wrote:

> We do.  I believe PHB was waiting for an OID assigned by IANA for must
> staple.   I'm not sure the request was ever submitted, but I'll follow up
> and make sure this moves forward.
> 
> Jeremy
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: TLS [mailto:tls-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Kurt Roeckx
> Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2014 12:48 PM
> To: tls@ietf.org
> Subject: [TLS] OCSP must staple
> 
> Hi,
> 
> It seems there is a draft to have OCSP must staple
> (draft-hallambaker-muststaple-00).  Does anybody know what the status of
> that is?  I've tried to contact the author but didn't get any reply.
> 
> Is this something we want adopt?
> 
> 
> Kurt
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TLS mailing list
> TLS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TLS mailing list
> TLS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls