IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TLS] Review of draft-ietf-tls-rfc4492bis-15

Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Tue, 21 March 2017 09:04 UTC

Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C15791293EB; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 02:04:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.302
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.302 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cs.tcd.ie
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2lf0X99Ac6qp; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 02:04:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [134.226.56.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 91543129536; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 02:04:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC876BE74; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 09:04:53 +0000 (GMT)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at scss.tcd.ie
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0B345zqXw6sA; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 09:04:53 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from [10.244.2.100] (95-45-153-252-dynamic.agg2.phb.bdt-fng.eircom.net [95.45.153.252]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 07D2DBEB5; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 09:04:33 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cs.tcd.ie; s=mail; t=1490087073; bh=VQGFenFBML8zjSh5yAhGOqIfdVzRG1kX6HC3Rw7I6Go=; h=Subject:To:References:Cc:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=VXZQGFLcDo/Ocs7Wb/kqisTHohEXmKHYSmPxJE5+HQEseUi7f5us6okh68tcOicsI ayVOyTpITmGeZRzuSEFv89eFG4FyeK5Yr5ID+oWyQxS1zOIonQ7iBkZmFwR3BApwcA MGNBnqDzcOVTDagBhgf4CvLs4OTKThK5OQtwKFKY=
To: Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
References: <CABcZeBPp2mJ3KeR_yzQH7bHzJ2TnJBmLzaFcCbbO7OYW9E7Svg@mail.gmail.com> <014753DA-5D5A-47ED-88D3-2291DC3DE78A@gmail.com>
Cc: "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>, IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Openpgp: id=D66EA7906F0B897FB2E97D582F3C8736805F8DA2; url=
Message-ID: <9467ab9e-1b4f-d108-c144-3f21792b4b50@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 09:04:32 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <014753DA-5D5A-47ED-88D3-2291DC3DE78A@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="lUv6WrHwfA2SH5eANC8D0dk5G4DBQPIIr"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/8mYZVBSWdbv5PcGswP8EMmAP4Wk>
Subject: Re: [TLS] Review of draft-ietf-tls-rfc4492bis-15
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 09:04:59 -0000

Thanks Yoav,

On 21/03/17 07:44, Yoav Nir wrote:
> Some that are not addressed, I’ve answered below.  Let me know if you
> want me to merge and submit.

I'd say give it a chance for one round of comments from Eric
and/or others, and then submit. Or, submit before you head
for an airport on your way to Chicago if that happens first.
If we're left with an RFC editor note being needed, that's
ok so long as it's simple enough.

Cheers,
S.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email