Re: [TLS] Please discuss: draft-housley-evidence-extns-00

Martin Rex <martin.rex@sap.com> Thu, 11 January 2007 22:42 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H58d5-0001HA-AX; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 17:42:39 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H58d3-0001BN-5g for tls@ietf.org; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 17:42:37 -0500
Received: from smtpde03.sap-ag.de ([155.56.68.140]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H58cz-0002vo-V7 for tls@ietf.org; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 17:42:37 -0500
Received: from sap-ag.de (smtpde03) by smtpde03.sap-ag.de (out) with ESMTP id XAA19971; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 23:42:19 +0100 (MEZ)
From: Martin Rex <martin.rex@sap.com>
Message-Id: <200701112242.XAA04497@uw1048.wdf.sap.corp>
Subject: Re: [TLS] Please discuss: draft-housley-evidence-extns-00
To: home_pw@msn.com
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 23:42:18 +0100
In-Reply-To: <BAY126-DAV8D9201E9CCD1D5BB83B5E92B10@phx.gbl> from "home_pw@msn.com" at Jan 11, 7 06:57:23 am
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-SAP: out
X-SAP: out
X-SAP: out
X-Spam-Score: 1.1 (+)
X-Scan-Signature: 7a6398bf8aaeabc7a7bb696b6b0a2aad
Cc: tls@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: tls@lists.ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: martin.rex@sap.com
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.lists.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/tls>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@lists.ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: tls-bounces@lists.ietf.org

home_pw@msn.com wrote:
> 
> The document was very much like the document on a PRF 
> pattern, done in collaboration with Eric, which didn’t even 
> pretend to be a complete disclosure! That one said to me: 
> shut up and rubber stamp.

10 Years ago the IETF was quite resistant to rubber stamping requests
(SSLv3, S/Mime), but I have the impression that the folks with the
hidden agendas have since significantly improved on their tactics
and achieved to blend in with traditional IETF in serveral areas.

-Martin

_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
TLS@lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls