IETF Logo Mail Archive

[TLS] Re: [IANA #1419884] expert review for draft-ietf-tls-dtls-rrc (tls-extensiontype-values)

Thomas Fossati <thomas.fossati@linaro.org> Wed, 28 May 2025 16:30 UTC

Return-Path: <thomas.fossati@linaro.org>
X-Original-To: tls@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: tls@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9BB32DF2D91 for <tls@mail2.ietf.org>; Wed, 28 May 2025 09:30:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PUKhCSVL4QFE for <tls@mail2.ietf.org>; Wed, 28 May 2025 09:30:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr1-x444.google.com (mail-wr1-x444.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::444]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6CB7D2DF2D81 for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 May 2025 09:30:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr1-x444.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-3a4c4e6a0ccso3529398f8f.3 for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 May 2025 09:30:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; t=1748449849; x=1749054649; darn=ietf.org; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=bYaG1ru5ZxSYfO4hcUUyOJjQwiioUKPWu3z26HdDxOc=; b=pY9QiaLbvhUN68KgCHr+a8BlcqTs2c5dzFePSUkg/e8eLFeHcJELftZAw4Kw25wVeF g0B3KXXwzC8zz+baNCBcwnexbOL+7OaNYSPK4C15YQFoelCB87zNpGcxn+zgJ9O2e/iI UXZHFk02SjwFEBfLyVRK/Cu6fAV+eP77JTZCrKkKGvkSij04YqCb1S4bUedxqABiNieq H7lobvsLDh6v1fI75ZJ2CB1kVQg5IuzJMLxMvbRaVNOKauF4jwKX9Dnckj8tAYLgImuo hbt1lyReJOu7GW3AAz2EQAN9rsnXgeVmfY8NP+ARnToT7A/jERioLHADErbkJo/tj9cn kefQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1748449849; x=1749054649; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=bYaG1ru5ZxSYfO4hcUUyOJjQwiioUKPWu3z26HdDxOc=; b=LYX3Ab2cyGxIDZP0Je/8BV6wuDeHE0hnvEdBz66aDhdapHeXJmJ1qJlDMvejTsMown OQ350QoMU+wRbZZzSBjvRrEoitM0VhYog49vUExM+xfyIMLaJmY+DaFZCqmRknthMLLh mbI8XZ/+ReMvlomCaas1cS4yUq6wpwRPKYJP2D5QI7i90PgIzvMDEGsyvdx9Pz7kRpM0 MRgKnvTaX9YOlLMhOU6ZufZsyHsOtTSKAOgcU2F3Is+RBiiwa/coJRm4XOVth8eo6q04 BZCKsh8vwL4QCunQvUgIMeCeLWcThma3k3T9iNIOvsJrUdJYMMEB15qaBSNHdsHZwkzD n2TA==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVt00q2qlIhhjlyUs8slzqRcmah4Obc9sHfITTbBnEz6Pc0sSVHbylgMroTFXhGFkz32SE=@ietf.org
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzNzaH4lWldNvT9nfhPLCYV/B5ORDAVj+QFh7inq28kpl3lZMwn oQB2hR4jyot+M2vg1ZsV7KLdcac2l1IPpO/miKUYmdiLp2DnJv5+rCIL+3p2z8pj+gc=
X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncsoWZEyBIR6vVlHN7E3/FUEOyu9HLkjXQ+Vcf3HSUqmD3XDO/935hq4T3nWRiS UuvlHPdQEinbw93ELBlRlunx4pQv3lhOYp2u6ypvCXFpN8KHvsnchLE0sWquEuTYET6w55eeTRC rSgPBOGRfTG66YYR9gaTSfa5aqBXGDUueJrbSu6J2mneCkJ8NjCJoNb347bXLbdKglWRTJ35p0n WLZTGuwoWV3eT0ZgxxnChYtj3gpoVXD96aQSl5yTSqlQGAEXABgN8/VjgxTOaH2MuGqbZ2Em4Hm WvfDo+gpf7Awnw5ic5COoPQBqZy2tFyrOjI+wii4erWhsKYmEHIw9e0/7ilLj4aSxYn6iMy4P/F i/e76sdPiBxAydpI=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGud9hxLBkvNi1MPMpprD6t4fPFxpQp5PED0ME3jFkUhzLVulZEtA6jTH/qE9ePh+kxi5XnwA==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:2505:b0:3a0:b1ff:8542 with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-3a4cb449af3mr13191820f8f.8.1748449849349; Wed, 28 May 2025 09:30:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tho-mbp.home ([2a02:1210:6ac5:f500:f83d:fc01:c6c:7e99]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 5b1f17b1804b1-45006498c32sm26672535e9.7.2025.05.28.09.30.47 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 28 May 2025 09:30:48 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 28 May 2025 18:30:47 +0200
From: Thomas Fossati <thomas.fossati@linaro.org>
To: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Message-ID: <v52rp7vxxkjaymwb6mzgh274mvplsm5ouasfjuqeycblmaihs7@si3lsihcjkxy>
References: <RT-Ticket-1419884@icann.org> <rt-5.0.3-771993-1748389585-210.1419884-9-0@icann.org> <rt-5.0.3-776217-1748394957-1627.1419884-9-0@icann.org> <IA1PR17MB642175ACD5AEA66CB57271DBCD67A@IA1PR17MB6421.namprd17.prod.outlook.com> <m6b3v4ogzomyvplgn7fj6aa33ecj7qwhbr3ixqfexdjhaoumkk@pt5ktqrjmqx3>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <m6b3v4ogzomyvplgn7fj6aa33ecj7qwhbr3ixqfexdjhaoumkk@pt5ktqrjmqx3>
Message-ID-Hash: GMWXQOGAGHTNRTA4H4ELZ2COVLGZQAXF
X-Message-ID-Hash: GMWXQOGAGHTNRTA4H4ELZ2COVLGZQAXF
X-MailFrom: thomas.fossati@linaro.org
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-tls.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: "drafts-expert-review-comment@iana.org" <drafts-expert-review-comment@iana.org>, "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>, "nicholas.sullivan+ietf@gmail.com" <nicholas.sullivan+ietf@gmail.com>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [TLS] Re: [IANA #1419884] expert review for draft-ietf-tls-dtls-rrc (tls-extensiontype-values)
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/9Ippy_XHu9k6V8lP-OJA2HKJ6aY>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:tls-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:tls-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:tls-leave@ietf.org>

Hi Rich,

On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 03:42:57PM +0100, Thomas Fossati wrote:
>>I am concerned about the new registry table being different from the
>>majority of TLS registrations. Why is that?
>
>You mean why we are using "DTLS-only" rather than "DTLS-OK"?
>
>Or the fact that we don't have a "Comments/Notes" column?
>
>If the former, it makes sense to invert the logic because RRC is
>primarily a DTLS mechanism, therefore it'd always score true using
>"DTLS-OK" semantic.
>
>If the latter, we have an open PR to align with rfc8447bis [1].
>
>cheers, t
>
>[1] https://github.com/tlswg/dtls-rrc/pull/75

You are right, the new registry should be Expert Review.

I have added https://github.com/tlswg/dtls-rrc/issues/78 to track this.

cheers, t

v2.35.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status