IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TLS] Consensus Call on draft-ietf-tls-dnssec-chain-extension

Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Thu, 12 April 2018 23:07 UTC

Return-Path: <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7719E124D6C for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Apr 2018 16:07:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.908
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.908 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, T_DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id guj4lIgCEtDa for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Apr 2018 16:07:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ot0-x232.google.com (mail-ot0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c0f::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4133D12D77C for <tls@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Apr 2018 16:07:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ot0-x232.google.com with SMTP id v6-v6so7904130otj.12 for <tls@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Apr 2018 16:07:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=64o5Bx09H/JbgDzKyjqtiFzsZq5gf8mMxU11FN4lZLY=; b=hOdTAIdUDlYtaiE5UMHMEvLxdfwTHYMLm7dL9Jm6ekGwEP4FWXcb72ATAZT6kD6xzQ jhSKLZrVDHV2m0Aes8URgOEaTmXsx225UIKqCX10lTw6ap1CbTc0ClhopJVbCZMqe/pd TOZeoglvcdB84hPphYtQ9TOlBVkiAAgnShL0w74AEg/7m2kKWWBtTvoofIphTBfzFPvI FN80evJwvS+jnPhf2uizpPXjUF8/Dts9XaZk1qawctmJpQuJeIsw0PHSRtWqK6PUVVSO ZwOcodukxd/MP5D2MvxA6sNlFcKSeUhTzBOSZ0JfpS5TSlZWxxJn474V4xJULBZ7V0O0 BJSw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=64o5Bx09H/JbgDzKyjqtiFzsZq5gf8mMxU11FN4lZLY=; b=I3W9B/NWe7cioa8M9kVecQYGWDYH7RxHJkI+xNpwMQ4zURg+kjkYxwp4pDp5y/2AQy 7j/v1/rwvUGj/GdiFnXONqR6bAogBqepmGRRGe6vrE66I1SnhODkf9ILDC5p1okB5u9j ZY9uRIlqRLJNnGthizmbyDR7G0676CFVyjG6Res+zC2M/TAdHm9yg4jDM9v/3EwCPVb4 /D1tVtw2Ya6Vvb+7ZAjfjShiBn42ybQscJm62bAse6XfVe73nngvQgG6ySB0DhMrxAZE DQmYaK2ixUOxLJ928LPUTcVI7w21ivCIHaVDuQnceszGFk5fCtYYVbLmFsi5sZ2+ER6U etCg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALQs6tCYqQRsY3NLgLvcU+hqxn/3IVYVZ3ZYq52E/zBjh2qtuLSjHMYj 27a35B/ZDr4L8i+FYYxVpMi0gP7ppzBtKXBHLUIsf4dU
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx4+H9l41nv/oZSQOZJhZnPq7zptwcNwmX/DY3+UnPn9Dt5EpP3hWdpqinL8WL8i6YfcTznB7FZ0AH5dc0/bgB/8=
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:4289:: with SMTP id r9-v6mr2142507ote.44.1523574476362; Thu, 12 Apr 2018 16:07:56 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.138.18.130 with HTTP; Thu, 12 Apr 2018 16:07:15 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <114FE78D-F340-4752-BEF0-459FE1548A80@dukhovni.org>
References: <CAOgPGoAhzEtxpW5mzmkf2kv3AcugNy0dAzhvpaqrTSuMSqWqfw@mail.gmail.com> <CAHPuVdXfVQ5ZYL+dTvFeTfOaz2NNPrqxvnWuqJkxu0aaKDF_Sg@mail.gmail.com> <20180410235321.GR25259@localhost> <20180411173348.GP17433@akamai.com> <alpine.LRH.2.21.1804120438460.24369@bofh.nohats.ca> <CAL02cgSuTOaT_NwnpXaa8DPhNJhzqZwepRL+J29BzcBfCTDtHw@mail.gmail.com> <CAHbuEH78KNyk8fnHThRkCERKPjZzYppi1uhkDx6kL_t448q0_g@mail.gmail.com> <20180412175441.GD20782@akamai.com> <6db83a59-1f0f-f552-0d48-6e2a8d43f602@nomountain.net> <CABkgnnUwOjkY1_KejV-YOw3YRqjFfzaYurEY1OpZ8phQVhcWLg@mail.gmail.com> <114FE78D-F340-4752-BEF0-459FE1548A80@dukhovni.org>
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2018 16:07:15 -0700
Message-ID: <CABcZeBOUoSy+brSE8uoF+FJ3sL024RnrKhY9VXrQ94bB+rXtMw@mail.gmail.com>
To: TLS WG <tls@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000073ee620569aed3cc"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/9JYmAYjrNsgRR2GILahGJStPMaQ>
Subject: Re: [TLS] Consensus Call on draft-ietf-tls-dnssec-chain-extension
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2018 23:07:59 -0000

On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 3:09 PM, Viktor Dukhovni <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org>
wrote:

>
>
> > On Apr 12, 2018, at 5:47 PM, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > If this is indeed about adding [goo], what prevents Viktor or Paul
> > from proposing a new addition to the protocol in the form of a new I-D
> > that enacts the changes they wish to see?
>
> Why publish a crippled specification that needs immediate amendments that
> would
> require a second parallel extension to be defined and used by clients and
> servers
> to fix the issues in the current specification?  And the time to get that
> second
> extension would effectively delay the publication of a usable protocol.
>
> The protocol as described prohibits denial of existence responses.  Willem
> acknowledged (thus far in an off-list message) that that's an oversight
> that
> should be corrected, and such a correction is the substance of option (A).
>

It would be good to get clarity on this. My understanding is that option a
involved
recommending (at some unspecified level) that people provide those
responses,
not just making it possible for them to do so.

-Ekr

v2.14.0 | Report a Bug | By Email