To: tls@ietf.org
References: <6140B7A6-A1C7-44BC-9C65-9BE0D5E1B580@sn3rd.com>
 <986797a7-81b0-7874-5f39-afe83c86635b@cs.tcd.ie>
 <CAOgPGoBYc7O+qmjM-ptkRkE6mRsOYgc5O7Wu9pm3drFp3TVa6Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <d7dfdc1a-2c96-fd88-df1b-3167fe0f804b@cs.tcd.ie>
 <CAHbuEH7E8MhFcMt2GSngSrGxN=6bU6LD49foPC-mdoUZboH_0Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@nomountain.net>
Message-ID: <1a024320-c674-6f75-ccc4-d27b75e3d017@nomountain.net>
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2018 20:41:53 -0900
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:52.0)
 Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAHbuEH7E8MhFcMt2GSngSrGxN=6bU6LD49foPC-mdoUZboH_0Q@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512;
 protocol="application/pgp-signature";
 boundary="1WmEpzPA40DIeMMBd0wR1FsdJY9giy7Vb"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/9SEebIdx0Su46Xv5FsipV64C2Xw>
Subject: Re: [TLS] TLS@IETF101 Agenda Posted
Precedence: list

This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
--1WmEpzPA40DIeMMBd0wR1FsdJY9giy7Vb
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="Tf8dYJVHNaNoUr26Si8jtqcaOUBkkd3ng";
 protected-headers="v1"
From: Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@nomountain.net>
To: tls@ietf.org
Message-ID: <1a024320-c674-6f75-ccc4-d27b75e3d017@nomountain.net>
Subject: Re: [TLS] TLS@IETF101 Agenda Posted
References: <6140B7A6-A1C7-44BC-9C65-9BE0D5E1B580@sn3rd.com>
 <986797a7-81b0-7874-5f39-afe83c86635b@cs.tcd.ie>
 <CAOgPGoBYc7O+qmjM-ptkRkE6mRsOYgc5O7Wu9pm3drFp3TVa6Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <d7dfdc1a-2c96-fd88-df1b-3167fe0f804b@cs.tcd.ie>
 <CAHbuEH7E8MhFcMt2GSngSrGxN=6bU6LD49foPC-mdoUZboH_0Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHbuEH7E8MhFcMt2GSngSrGxN=6bU6LD49foPC-mdoUZboH_0Q@mail.gmail.com>

--Tf8dYJVHNaNoUr26Si8jtqcaOUBkkd3ng
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 3/9/18 12:57 PM, Kathleen Moriarty wrote:
> The hummed answer to that question was very close to 50/50 in the
> room, inconclusive.

=46rom the perspective of consensus decision-making that's
actually very clear - there's no consensus.  What that
means in practice depends on the question that was asked,
but at any rate I think what matters here is a lack of
consensus.

Also, there's been basically no discussion of the draft
on the mailing list, and I'm not sure why.

Melinda

--=20
Software longa, hardware brevis

PGP fingerprint: 4F68 2D93 2A17 96F8 20F2
                 34C0 DFB8 9172 9A76 DB8F


--Tf8dYJVHNaNoUr26Si8jtqcaOUBkkd3ng--

--1WmEpzPA40DIeMMBd0wR1FsdJY9giy7Vb
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=up4P
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--1WmEpzPA40DIeMMBd0wR1FsdJY9giy7Vb--