IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TLS] (draft) WG adoption call: draft-bmoeller-tls-falsestart

Sean Turner <turners@ieca.com> Thu, 16 April 2015 16:21 UTC

Return-Path: <turners@ieca.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0AA11B3293 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Apr 2015 09:21:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.567
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.567 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id w7Kod52hrycI for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Apr 2015 09:21:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gateway06.websitewelcome.com (gateway06.websitewelcome.com [67.18.15.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6EFD21B328F for <tls@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Apr 2015 09:21:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by gateway06.websitewelcome.com (Postfix, from userid 5007) id CA14BF6B94D29; Thu, 16 Apr 2015 11:21:05 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from gator3286.hostgator.com (gator3286.hostgator.com [198.57.247.250]) by gateway06.websitewelcome.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B91D4F6B94CE1 for <tls@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Apr 2015 11:21:05 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from [96.231.227.6] (port=61494 helo=[192.168.1.10]) by gator3286.hostgator.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <turners@ieca.com>) id 1YimXG-0004zo-Tl; Thu, 16 Apr 2015 11:21:03 -0500
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
From: Sean Turner <turners@ieca.com>
In-Reply-To: <813475A8-DC71-42BA-A27E-DF11B0155FD1@ieca.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 12:21:01 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <64FA6BC3-49D0-4EF6-8332-4ADBDB62BAA3@ieca.com>
References: <813475A8-DC71-42BA-A27E-DF11B0155FD1@ieca.com>
To: "<tls@ietf.org>" <tls@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - gator3286.hostgator.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - ieca.com
X-BWhitelist: no
X-Source-IP: 96.231.227.6
X-Exim-ID: 1YimXG-0004zo-Tl
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-Source-Sender: ([192.168.1.10]) [96.231.227.6]:61494
X-Source-Auth: sean.turner@ieca.com
X-Email-Count: 2
X-Source-Cap: ZG9tbWdyNDg7ZG9tbWdyNDg7Z2F0b3IzMjg2Lmhvc3RnYXRvci5jb20=
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/9V_EIqvOEi86ccmOqLnCI6fpzXM>
Cc: draft-bmoeller-tls-falsestart@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [TLS] (draft) WG adoption call: draft-bmoeller-tls-falsestart
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 16:21:07 -0000

Based on list discussion we’re going to go adopt this draft as a WG.

Bodo please submit a WG version of this draft so we can begin addressing Brian’s comments in the WG -01 version.

Thanks everybody!

spt

On Mar 31, 2015, at 12:20, Sean Turner <turners@ieca.com> wrote:

> All,
> 
> There’s been some interested expressed in having http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-bmoeller-tls-falsestart/ adopted as a TLS WG item.  If you would like for this draft to become a WG document, and you are willing to review drafts as it moves through the process please indicate as much on this thread.  If you are opposed to this being a WG document, please say so (and say why). Thanks in advance.
> 
> J&S

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email