Re: [TLS] [Cfrg] Closing out tls1.3 "Limits on key usage" PRs (#765/#769)

Tony Arcieri <bascule@gmail.com> Mon, 13 February 2017 23:25 UTC

Return-Path: <bascule@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E22C312953B for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 15:25:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.698
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.698 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id y9B5ULpRx9kp for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 15:25:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-vk0-x232.google.com (mail-vk0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 96EAC129430 for <tls@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 15:25:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-vk0-x232.google.com with SMTP id x75so70629668vke.2 for <tls@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 15:25:27 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=fJNE7OtKbDiV901D5n5md9yUJun4f+A02r7fHPg+AZE=; b=XV05Uzi9xuAsHj/GlD5UlaDKy0a4Kayg3DX56bClNb7lDA1x71Paa3RLSfvft2DxWT OUq/vJbbdYZ68NsDjqAis0RpPsQrZZ7+tyVkFXh6PVgUS+3FiCpMtYg8t57JVfjFtJ5T /M401TcGZfCNcqk8bfhbOh2Ofxx9lqTVrCTodubm2Kfs6BiCXrm9Jc6Fq+LNSGYX7gcu gKvG/CL4Djkw4hSsuBXzdlfI2ZMaIBqvnNO6Hsz0yNXWaxfvWE2C09RocRJOIehuYMIc p9nyk2XKfNDVIxHAXhQFrb/7xeeubnNt18FjAtDYyaiXkWiCKu/ZXcpYKpFSPk/vrBWP g5uQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=fJNE7OtKbDiV901D5n5md9yUJun4f+A02r7fHPg+AZE=; b=IX41SK1Ly33y6k5p6pcE1sBlUpOAGZR2dO3RHAYACS2LeUwddwz1ThFJaKfh8qpp0K 9CvAeKsBocMOifMKqIrHVru1043ZgTGemgNM1l6LYjoQ+dWJaZJQWSAGdbIwzbU5nlb0 TXrfjcux1s4i7qiNBp4hpUPeOVYAN8TXWuPMFWrA9k6SEJ87O3ikFjai0oiT6FvBVi3l nn7JDDkNNchd0Td3nDemlpkwelfCUpAIy2OtAlMEF2zpdVgNX/UNJ1jouVlOWkhVvraz sKXTJCoo+kP1lH8kdatbEmtnun5FjgceZ0TY0c85sO2BL5lwkcVU+TxAGK8VksZSB3lL JQZg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39ld3vPK7+ljW4VfUX4VKvhZtXw4ZtpDfh9Laj3vnMTci/eHo8/N7S7Xas6DhQUDSKLrPeyNGuq74XvA3Q==
X-Received: by 10.31.213.7 with SMTP id m7mr11134474vkg.48.1487028326752; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 15:25:26 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.103.70.130 with HTTP; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 15:25:06 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <95D221C7-40A6-4BDD-B8CD-5C4F9C405D3F@azet.org>
References: <352D31A3-5A8B-4790-9473-195C256DEEC8@sn3rd.com> <95D221C7-40A6-4BDD-B8CD-5C4F9C405D3F@azet.org>
From: Tony Arcieri <bascule@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 15:25:06 -0800
Message-ID: <CAHOTMVJzogVu6K0MDNBux2STtbzkGT0yAopGOaEJXEzhOwSL6w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Aaron Zauner <azet@azet.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c07aadc2ff35b054871c36b"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/9k-U7nf4bFH_ODQgnL6Qh1MPskY>
Cc: IRTF CFRG <cfrg@irtf.org>, "<tls@ietf.org>" <tls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [TLS] [Cfrg] Closing out tls1.3 "Limits on key usage" PRs (#765/#769)
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 23:25:29 -0000

On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 3:21 PM, Aaron Zauner <azet@azet.org> wrote:

> I thought the cited paper sorted this out like a year ago.
>
> In favor of option a


I am also in favor of option A.

The wording in option B is simultaneously much more unclear and much more
verbose. I consider it a regression.

Option C is more similar to option A, but not an improvement, IMO.

-- 
Tony Arcieri