Re: [TLS] draft-ietf-tls-esni feedback

Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Tue, 22 October 2019 18:24 UTC

Return-Path: <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9688C120953 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Oct 2019 11:24:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KhZL1iZX0YLQ for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Oct 2019 11:24:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x129.google.com (mail-lf1-x129.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::129]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F073912094C for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Oct 2019 11:24:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x129.google.com with SMTP id x4so7598022lfn.8 for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Oct 2019 11:24:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=CCOEFKx//aNiGSnzX9P8OcRMsUEdKRyyaxT/yD2V5ZY=; b=NF08AXOv1JgWRbUshUSp5UQANRoD29G+hD5oCn0NwcZgn9a64z9IA7eqJ6Gl36iLJq zH/B8nZw97c3WGOj3cE44c8C67WpGGv9fS6eoG5cHF8RePmrsJI9gUCAGGjGJRJyZXKQ yxr4kujgZnMDuFlX1pbiXbC8VaFlkuQKNxK7SNEZaHTudX9MYz5MM4VVz72l8Lgw1Czn 04XtIf+7J8ktLhnMn5jfBQSc2PhTlPOxVkCJf65vaaFV+FblnlgvRJfJ2aGFm3adXY02 tb18r5bbmVxB2dEu3SDJG25IAHsAHWkTErfguBqZyeAOx+JR9elWmN/F7hVSh7dPQMjP sa+g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=CCOEFKx//aNiGSnzX9P8OcRMsUEdKRyyaxT/yD2V5ZY=; b=nAu2N6N2Ffpe40U3piXEmPxu1dprUTm54Zv8jWgARaIAjB5Jo5MOq+ynhb3KoEaGfU zPMTXTkQJc0vhkle93JToClnL9sCSUqLp1mVr4hpOjcv7ozbkyVKlHwXqFha3H2LPVRv m/IoUS+BqpAGfnotSja4PNOg/+ONkzgNSrTvoqnKpfzv8mWvsQYN0nIs3GlWQh+wFUXx U5N4sc9Bi+/FIzoQNPx4AF1elI5JmakanfUve0DX1C/VT+/XqxpJIEjdCwbQ4PkKn9z/ SJhVHO5Pn8SEc2Y42rJRAyaN94l4hz1G63qkmZuEqUiu0V08bCEc85CQY7B8q2l06DE3 VcFA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXgjTNFlRpyH4pohSnUZIOnYFFFxRwMgeMB7rZe2bEbh9DyROLx sSpmLKNMR+m8GjZwV3cp5XRS3j+v4CX1laMLeY7/TQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxWemXwrkc1keY+GgEGMpeAyjQDGWmHBAr8tQSAx2FvDbFOmEi5KNmrInoeRuPnYBLEnlCiv95647o52CuUbK0=
X-Received: by 2002:a19:c6d6:: with SMTP id w205mr17797668lff.17.1571768691225; Tue, 22 Oct 2019 11:24:51 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAChr6Sw3f7du3JYxfcWSZje1zjDzsRBQyDjob-AvzjWeZzKW7g@mail.gmail.com> <CAChr6SxWE66jPRbnBRtwNSn3L+uNFkoFBbYNOBAkKDN05qotoA@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBOy8ogJrmFajxX1pqjqgnE61gE=c3CWz+pp34NWHmGKbw@mail.gmail.com> <03e15760-dfce-cd7b-baea-56ac70d92192@cs.tcd.ie> <CAChr6SzmpSn3Q8tBi+Pdc+Bq7stiukbufbh-jDt+AEtrkV8XGg@mail.gmail.com> <f87c2916-d03d-2715-7b36-7b70fead8df4@cs.tcd.ie> <CAChr6SxfT0ed5J89siGX23A0G77BJQWxFRDoJ1w0v7=5O0KERw@mail.gmail.com> <8063bb12-8462-53fa-fa62-1e5abb1a652e@cs.tcd.ie> <CAHbrMsBPJqzaUSa42gGq45MfsTvCVW7t95q3feWEiSYeSN9ocw@mail.gmail.com> <333fde42-76f9-1af3-0f0f-c70914b0222e@cs.tcd.ie> <CAHbrMsA0PFwvu3hvZgXMbe2Buzq9dQHgNJJLOqtyMUzb-qpc0A@mail.gmail.com> <04a5a50a-3268-d9fb-de16-abb9224409ed@cs.tcd.ie> <CAChr6SySVXsH1J7KGDJjjB=wdxhdaCe207pLn2fGFMmDb1q82w@mail.gmail.com> <BE5E7283-6EF4-4113-ADBA-7790A5DFACD8@akamai.com> <e20daa2c-b239-11e0-87e7-beaebb80aebf@cs.tcd.ie> <CABcZeBMHnz7t6QhXVu8BfXmA1Q4RU1x06TOpcyqFY2FZJmenGQ@mail.gmail.com> <120231f6-698c-03c0-824e-0077b85b6439@cs.tcd.ie>
In-Reply-To: <120231f6-698c-03c0-824e-0077b85b6439@cs.tcd.ie>
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2019 11:24:14 -0700
Message-ID: <CABcZeBML9=9cdA4MV+3tu3_2Tmx4bB5dNPR=DhcZYc-GSmsJnw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Cc: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>, Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com>, "TLS@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000829026059583eae9"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/APaTILPmqmkoU6nJSazl1DyGsjw>
Subject: Re: [TLS] draft-ietf-tls-esni feedback
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2019 18:24:55 -0000

On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 11:15 AM Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>;
wrote:

>
>
> On 22/10/2019 19:10, Eric Rescorla wrote:
> > Uh,why?
>
> Openness, transparency, enabling the WG to make decisions on
> the list.


The WG has the chance to make decisions on the list *in response to*
proposals in the draft. At this stage of the draft development, I don't
think it's problematic for authors to put proposals in a draft with the
understanding that they are proposals. Eventually, we'll need to enter a
"no changes without consensus" phase, but I don't think it's at all obvious
that that's true yet.

-Ekr