Re: [TLS] WG adoption: draft-nir-tls-rfc4492bis

Stephen Checkoway <s@pahtak.org> Fri, 28 November 2014 06:51 UTC

Return-Path: <s@pahtak.org>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 476211A1A43 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Nov 2014 22:51:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id J4tESywl9-wD for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Nov 2014 22:51:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qa0-f43.google.com (mail-qa0-f43.google.com [209.85.216.43]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E6A151A1A3E for <tls@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Nov 2014 22:51:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qa0-f43.google.com with SMTP id bm13so4091815qab.2 for <tls@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Nov 2014 22:51:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references :to; bh=FHnyB8u2j4BtDZDxYYQBiqmPT9lreFKQki6U1yL3Kvg=; b=aEDGXBV4jPq2uEAgV6yVU4VRIgtGcQpaq7uMxxfSPEHedkzP4d0jwyYL+L/WPbnJum PJeToOgZF11tUzJ7FY4asQGwIqak3GlevCXlre+JvKvCxEay6xluV+PwRQGfYoSW+k38 sATS1t93fUw9NvWyWxCb67xj8Z7R5Qx1jxHMLFPEKT7xt8t5QwSNpkAJ2qcrdbZ7qe7e qXA/+AESCK3JtGqOwzR8mDiYrgJxGszGjyubjveJHrSIwHkXcHb41u2D2Ql42FhHkECk mLHJhBJCOTEMgVOQo6Lw6C30cUAG3mN/m9L3x4tAORHW33Bci6TCtC/V2jX/qnGHYNaE P3MA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnPPMvLsyUy1RYnSMLiLWjFmHpl/dW7uUmwPg26f4sfXTwSW0QR9X0ABfOSiMjunCIclGXv
X-Received: by 10.224.173.8 with SMTP id n8mr61397569qaz.49.1417157516167; Thu, 27 Nov 2014 22:51:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from zbox.pahtak.org ([68.48.196.126]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id t5sm2922898qad.5.2014.11.27.22.51.54 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 27 Nov 2014 22:51:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.0.1.8] (ip-210-102.oberlin.net [208.66.210.102]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by zbox.pahtak.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3C526AC2896; Fri, 28 Nov 2014 01:51:53 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
From: Stephen Checkoway <s@pahtak.org>
In-Reply-To: <12F35B29-212B-43D4-AC5E-239EB3D9BF9A@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2014 01:51:52 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <E249451D-913B-45A6-9FCD-E27B3495DBB4@pahtak.org>
References: <AA93BAA4-5C5F-4969-8DF6-A83287D80F6D@ieca.com> <AFF9C4EE-6BCA-4AA6-BAB5-A457CDCC67AA@gmail.com> <D1DCDF76-5CA4-442C-852B-30A88EF3B1B1@pahtak.org> <12F35B29-212B-43D4-AC5E-239EB3D9BF9A@gmail.com>
To: Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/BZiW5JMUasg6ZuzQVbhbYd3WcHw
Cc: "TLS@ietf.org (tls@ietf.org)" <tls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [TLS] WG adoption: draft-nir-tls-rfc4492bis
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2014 06:51:58 -0000

On Nov 27, 2014, at 5:21 PM, Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:

> Once this is accepted and -00 submitted would be a great time to raise this or make a pull request to get rid of this (IMO silly) restriction.

Great. Sounds good to me!

-- 
Stephen Checkoway