IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TLS] Proposed text for removing renegotiation

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Wed, 28 May 2014 20:15 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8ABF21A029F for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 May 2014 13:15:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.551
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.551 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sHBUxSVGnqxy for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 May 2014 13:15:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from prod-mail-xrelay08.akamai.com (prod-mail-xrelay08.akamai.com [96.6.114.112]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C37E1A0051 for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 May 2014 13:15:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from prod-mail-xrelay08.akamai.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by postfix.imss70 (Postfix) with ESMTP id B53B6481B0; Wed, 28 May 2014 20:15:31 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from prod-mail-relay09.akamai.com (prod-mail-relay09.akamai.com [172.27.22.68]) by prod-mail-xrelay08.akamai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9C1948199; Wed, 28 May 2014 20:15:31 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from usma1ex-cashub.kendall.corp.akamai.com (usma1ex-cashub4.kendall.corp.akamai.com [172.27.105.20]) by prod-mail-relay09.akamai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 914DB1E03D; Wed, 28 May 2014 20:15:31 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from USMBX1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.107.26]) by USMA1EX-CASHUB4.kendall.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.105.20]) with mapi; Wed, 28 May 2014 16:15:31 -0400
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Date: Wed, 28 May 2014 16:15:30 -0400
Thread-Topic: [TLS] Proposed text for removing renegotiation
Thread-Index: Ac96sSymbtu3UdjhS1OilrWOAoLbtgAAClGA
Message-ID: <2A0EFB9C05D0164E98F19BB0AF3708C7130E4C1428@USMBX1.msg.corp.akamai.com>
References: <CABkgnnXaLKmxXL01hQEdxHSNGt3nZQQNBLDD5H2LqBzTo3vK4g@mail.gmail.com> <20140528004408.D184F1AD1D@ld9781.wdf.sap.corp> <CABkgnnUrMpmUH7DBgoZUAofe4J6PqNfYn9ORcmwu4385VAUX5g@mail.gmail.com> <53863F1D.3060707@amacapital.net> <CABkgnnWCqwVR1TFn8bM5=yNrmYSLMst1r3U_MR5eMD+Dkyv0rg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnWCqwVR1TFn8bM5=yNrmYSLMst1r3U_MR5eMD+Dkyv0rg@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/Bczc-rPNKLNJTVp-ivWQ3FQrVaE
Cc: "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [TLS] Proposed text for removing renegotiation
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 May 2014 20:15:36 -0000

> The whole point is to avoid the DH.  

I'm not sure that should be a major design point.  For the one use-case we know, do we know if those long lived xmpp connections are to small clients (such as android phones) or server to server?

	/r$

--  
Principal Security Engineer
Akamai Technologies, Cambridge, MA
IM: rsalz@jabber.me; Twitter: RichSalz

v2.27.6 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status