Re: [TLS] RSA-PSS in TLS 1.3

Viktor Dukhovni <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org> Wed, 02 March 2016 06:57 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59C591A1B8C for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Mar 2016 22:57:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id M3MS7M1CXUlF for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Mar 2016 22:57:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mournblade.imrryr.org (mournblade.imrryr.org [38.117.134.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F1251A1B8B for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Mar 2016 22:57:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mournblade.imrryr.org (Postfix, from userid 1034) id 10948284D9E; Wed, 2 Mar 2016 06:57:48 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2016 06:57:48 +0000
From: Viktor Dukhovni <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org>
To: tls@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20160302065747.GC10917@mournblade.imrryr.org>
References: <CAOgPGoD=AAFDUXN8VkOHwTMEUm+-qi548NsicoD=1yQKSu-sng@mail.gmail.com> <56D4ABAD.90902@brainhub.org> <20160229233617.5466ebd3@pc1> <56D51FFB.9050909@brainhub.org> <DE710794-CA42-48E1-9AB9-A2BE2899E071@gmail.com> <56D5DE1D.3000708@akr.io> <BBA8149E-114A-49D3-8159-A87ADB545482@gmail.com> <56D63BC7.5010302@brainhub.org> <BC718116-64C4-46C0-870C-D82DE64B4C63@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <BC718116-64C4-46C0-870C-D82DE64B4C63@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/C0bYNONzCrhk5sr55FS9znvazxk>
Subject: Re: [TLS] RSA-PSS in TLS 1.3
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tls@ietf.org
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2016 06:57:50 -0000

On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 08:37:46AM +0200, Yoav Nir wrote:

> Because this is a particular field that we control.

Which is in itself a reasonable argument for leaving legacy behind,
...  but also because adaptive attacks are I think a greater potential
threat against interactive TLS than against a bunch of CA-authored
bits at rest.

-- 
	Viktor.