Re: [TLS] [Cfrg] 3DES diediedie

Ben Laurie <benl@google.com> Mon, 05 September 2016 20:44 UTC

Return-Path: <benl@google.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C68B112B0D3 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Sep 2016 13:44:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.209
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.209 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.508, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TPbcDTi4iNK0 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Sep 2016 13:44:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vk0-x233.google.com (mail-vk0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 20BFA12B01D for <tls@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Sep 2016 13:44:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vk0-x233.google.com with SMTP id j189so75169281vkc.2 for <tls@ietf.org>; Mon, 05 Sep 2016 13:44:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=3zlmWJuW/hkl7FkVqs7omrHh9R5dD9fBoEzsrPhKUHQ=; b=dWG0ZrwFQsS7PWUU0ep5rBwOTHsQPXhVbz2Ubh0nuLE05A4mSx3e7V8OVBpxyDNkDy orSxe9Qij5SC4nRqEo0aCSfA9Els1xguWJWWboDAQL3UbhIhRvPlU2zn+9nKWcSYHh8V twoAFSH9GMyZjxqwNSFKlWFOziEELvMUEl7kxFtfxq7CDGhlTZy7wSaLVhtOAdMS2ux7 Bfk/BfIv3Qd0pQR+4agqNyxW+5eiQ8jtCPmx0TfGmMEudYp80A/ckeOksXc31ep6zy54 8zC2ffJ5ru+ikFDJDeHo630hWxzT+V2CyTsgRz/o4vNEaPTRV1dihAaSKS7UPqozZfkt AORQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=3zlmWJuW/hkl7FkVqs7omrHh9R5dD9fBoEzsrPhKUHQ=; b=b2wKrxXHUrivEtyoaELderGHPKi4nAlaUIxXkfeYdZdCTD1nSRaAeNBqnb3gy/d4j/ SaAFWpL2LywR2DjGn99/vmnB3I8arHgqVgUSOVF0odqGUvxKU/2KSsT02IIha95NLnGU Ta2sgX8rMz174vUsEb/kuXtISg9s8agBytw57mt9frGILNSusIcwJCC2WR0oTxRk7gxD vFSJ/R718wvCGBFDMzPPdTkd/GkLj6HTrbsC55K0xylTOPb5NiuCusNAgTmpD7BDsBlN OeedEqubNY8MQG9gPTbvZhFjkrm6McDnrMyIoM+Cupa4m724vsZnF5LVIsaoxkKVv7eE kCwQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwNJyDa/q9PSvRvG4Wr84u6A+fo89kyTcpFLIjzDRfro8q6sW5iH4TBPYZFj5c91QqqFyZogTqJMARIHAjpS
X-Received: by 10.31.147.142 with SMTP id v136mr23373675vkd.103.1473108291885; Mon, 05 Sep 2016 13:44:51 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.31.148.11 with HTTP; Mon, 5 Sep 2016 13:44:50 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <201609051906.u85J6jWT012165@rumpleteazer.rhmr.com>
References: <CABrd9STOCbBo=g22XySRnWofHwVZkrC-ripZY38yLRZV2kQh3A@mail.gmail.com> <201609051906.u85J6jWT012165@rumpleteazer.rhmr.com>
From: Ben Laurie <benl@google.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2016 21:44:50 +0100
Message-ID: <CABrd9STxBFwxkz01twfNKddC2q_4V089b1bWj1pOZ_F5=WAewQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Hilarie Orman <hilarie@purplestreak.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/CB-8Gn76WgMMkmhrtluuqCK4PdA>
Cc: cfrg@irtf.org, "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [TLS] [Cfrg] 3DES diediedie
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2016 20:44:55 -0000

On 5 September 2016 at 20:06, Hilarie Orman <hilarie@purplestreak.com> wrote:
> At some time when attribution was hard, I wrote:
> >  On 31 August 2016 at 20:48, Hilarie Orman <hilarie@purplestreak.com> wrote:
> >  > An ARM is far too much hardware to throw at "read sensor/munge data/send
> >  > data".
>
> >  The question is not "how much hardware?" but "price?" - with  ARMs
> >  including h/w AES coming in at $2 for a single unit, its hard to explain
> >  why you\d want to use a less powerful CPU...
>
> Power.

AIUI the main power sink is comms.