Re: [TLS] FNV versus SHA-1 in cached info

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Mon, 10 May 2010 15:19 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: tls@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80C9D3A69EE for <tls@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 May 2010 08:19:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.784
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.784 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.338, BAYES_50=0.001, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qBHN2ZxJqlV3 for <tls@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 May 2010 08:19:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hoffman.proper.com (Hoffman.Proper.COM [207.182.41.81]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D61D3A6A68 for <tls@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 May 2010 08:17:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.20.30.158] (75-101-30-90.dsl.dynamic.sonic.net [75.101.30.90]) (authenticated bits=0) by hoffman.proper.com (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o4AFGkMl070264 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 10 May 2010 08:16:47 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <p06240810c80dd3af4bf7@[10.20.30.158]>
In-Reply-To: <20100510150234.GP9429@oracle.com>
References: <20100507210600.GL9429@oracle.com> <C80DC854.AA88%stefan@aaa-sec.com> <20100510150234.GP9429@oracle.com>
Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 08:16:46 -0700
To: Nicolas Williams <Nicolas.Williams@oracle.com>, Stefan Santesson <stefan@aaa-sec.com>
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Cc: "Kemp, David P." <DPKemp@missi.ncsc.mil>, tls@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [TLS] FNV versus SHA-1 in cached info
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 15:19:37 -0000

At 10:02 AM -0500 5/10/10, Nicolas Williams wrote:
>On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 02:27:32PM +0200, Stefan Santesson wrote:
>> Unfortunately even informational references need to be stable documents
>> (AFAIK).
>
>Not true.

+1 to Nico. There are plenty (too many, IMO) informational references in RFCs that are to web sites that have already been 404'd.

--Paul Hoffman, Director
--VPN Consortium