[TLS] Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-ietf-tls-external-psk-importer-06: (with COMMENT)

Martin Duke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Wed, 24 February 2021 00:34 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Martin Duke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-tls-external-psk-importer@ietf.org, tls-chairs@ietf.org, tls@ietf.org, Joseph Salowey <joe@salowey.net>, joe@salowey.net
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <161412685989.24504.5451813200833068681@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2021 16:34:20 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/CRWjPC_k_hatEqJszg2xPmxW9t8>
Subject: [TLS] Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-ietf-tls-external-psk-importer-06: (with COMMENT)

Martin Duke has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-tls-external-psk-importer-06: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tls-external-psk-importer/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks for answering my DISCUSS. The length mismatch will end up being resolved
by the TLS decoder. I created a PR that can provide a useful warning for
implementers, but I don't see this as an interoperability issue anymore.

[TLS] Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-ietf-tl… Martin Duke via Datatracker