[TLS] Re: Working Group Last Call for RFC8773bis
Loganaden Velvindron <loganaden@gmail.com> Thu, 29 May 2025 10:07 UTC
Return-Path: <loganaden@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tls@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: tls@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8E082E43597 for <tls@mail2.ietf.org>; Thu, 29 May 2025 03:07:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vkRi2hlSeF0K for <tls@mail2.ietf.org>; Thu, 29 May 2025 03:07:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf1-x42a.google.com (mail-pf1-x42a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::42a]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9AFB62E43592 for <tls@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 May 2025 03:07:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf1-x42a.google.com with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-742c7a52e97so532907b3a.3 for <tls@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 May 2025 03:07:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1748513223; x=1749118023; darn=ietf.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=uP5FORcsGj3FjVR4lz7yz7fOrFlqpp/U0+VQuE1xhK0=; b=l3vVtwuPMpCj9p3UJCn2g7ItVcrujX/SFoweAMTA4EdEIjv74oiKG3aZWR9d2g/8Tm A0mBRx7L6tcO1igXJTFg3luAOi+YThQR9z7oAmnlgmMQLzcr3GPnTo8WJC0/pJW8Yrp7 GmNfCcndA3799KyKDgllh8Mic1V9c8QLOkaBQVM57OtKYQxTedKJnDKHDki9296r0cZf 7FtmcXtdht7mPwm6ueADKaSLCf69q6clODM9ul7oU1+bV8ji7VQoDaRNXK0iuAI8c/0K 7g8S95Q5OM1AfwFziv55kbrNDgrP53Wp4+JqJOhxleWRtE+yKsBcfRE63TLB5b5c9YZm rk5g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1748513223; x=1749118023; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=uP5FORcsGj3FjVR4lz7yz7fOrFlqpp/U0+VQuE1xhK0=; b=unRPuT7aEh2RBmToPcyyizA3gBDPyOYn9NtganOVHm+a0HBBLm6nou72UfLy9uxHNt ltCYx684ETlmNMiJnAN0GEJw5osad5wagS3qH5XznmvVqSGuDGJVyqFQgCiLkNlb0o+s 8xLnxT9EohsjIWbT2c4FGEUqdp3nNrHqNcz0EUWRjqaQf/ZBh9M6aFMPeLZ+4YQX1q4X 48R3cLxjBfeY2eXxNmaWF1tr0SrKatcMoZUmpxx0WPU95IkMzrxGNUG/dDnepmuudtiv Xo1Lj1zXWpqAaSjtjtA33AU38KltTHMoXrG4tHOK5ZVCutSCwcaK+ccKVwaCZMvjUOaW ogyw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxMTDe5+5CmOpO7xQvaDvB7DJ2nY5MFvAsjMDvFYrzTngwZULfN TlW+8km76phwoVSQSVk6WdsaKcY6XA2yy4ck0nyM5YjlNm8hmxR2WvFYgH1clYB+mtywYPSTiT5 NncTBl1MGbHoARa8gemiofrFGORXd81x7dzsSaGY=
X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncvfJvpfvMSbgo7ta6AhuADmgcDkyHtlwQvrclahHgPL0zCfUzGXN7O+GfoBY5y M4X3OUVbV29Sf28MOwoAtFNFsfBGgWg2o0mNUdfTBTpFKeByG8UsKFinroTjKTT76MTTm0Kp4t+ aViIRxGOoTV3UbpTKh/h4Xpr+l/sZEBEzEUaEfCAA7qK6TiGhXJnIbtk7lb/9/pA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGf5w7dbXeuhK1kMjxbphrudVHrahAa+C/uTISqcbx07XWow/mrbZiFGd+s0xJrlZlR/gnyFMP7DDbQCQw2mrA=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a21:38f:b0:1f5:7873:304f with SMTP id adf61e73a8af0-2188c3b27ebmr32959984637.37.1748513222571; Thu, 29 May 2025 03:07:02 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAOgPGoCdGaQhb2Pw=zJ4F04V7kA6d5xwk5Ja55zhBfwHpmPxLQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAOgPGoCdGaQhb2Pw=zJ4F04V7kA6d5xwk5Ja55zhBfwHpmPxLQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Loganaden Velvindron <loganaden@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2025 14:06:50 +0400
X-Gm-Features: AX0GCFtjQWo7ZgR0QeEujX4WFhRPll9Hzpc4jFRIzWYi2LpT5Dx7xb5Wi1pEPSk
Message-ID: <CAOp4FwQL31+SH5o+iY25_2F8H9xdJMFRQw0gvnNjsM7PJvq5cg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Joseph Salowey <joe@salowey.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID-Hash: X653JOGDCS5S2W3BODTSIQFZF6OJD5DT
X-Message-ID-Hash: X653JOGDCS5S2W3BODTSIQFZF6OJD5DT
X-MailFrom: loganaden@gmail.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-tls.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: "<tls@ietf.org>" <tls@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [TLS] Re: Working Group Last Call for RFC8773bis
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/C_ETwtK7wnGWiod3a5tdLSmHkJw>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:tls-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:tls-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:tls-leave@ietf.org>
On Tue, 13 May 2025 at 20:44, Joseph Salowey <joe@salowey.net> wrote: > > Russ has made modifications to the rfc8773bis and published a new draft [1] to address the comments from the FATT. You can see the diffs with the previous version are here: [2] and the FATT commentary from IETF 122 here: [3]. > > This is a working group last call for this document. If you believe this document has sufficiently addressed the concerns please indicate so on this thread. If you do not think it is sufficient please indicate what text modifications would address your issue. This call will remain open until May 28, 2025. > In the security section, While Grover’s algorithm (described in Section 7.1 of [I-D.ietf-pquip-pqc-engineers]) allows a quantum computer to perform a brute force key search using quadratically fewer steps than would be required with classical computers, there are a number of mitigating factors suggesting that Grover’s algorithm will not speed up brute force symmetric key search as dramatically as one might suspect Isn't that section 2.1 of ietf-pquip-pqc-engineers instead of section 7.1 ?
- [TLS] Re: Working Group Last Call for RFC8773bis Thom Wiggers
- [TLS] Working Group Last Call for RFC8773bis Joseph Salowey
- [TLS] Re: Working Group Last Call for RFC8773bis Salz, Rich
- [TLS] Re: Working Group Last Call for RFC8773bis Russ Housley
- [TLS] Re: Working Group Last Call for RFC8773bis Owen Friel (ofriel)
- [TLS] Re: Working Group Last Call for RFC8773bis Dan Harkins
- [TLS] Re: Working Group Last Call for RFC8773bis Peter Yee
- [TLS] Re: Working Group Last Call for RFC8773bis John Mattsson
- [TLS] Re: Working Group Last Call for RFC8773bis Muhammad Usama Sardar
- [TLS] Re: Working Group Last Call for RFC8773bis Russ Housley
- [TLS] Re: Working Group Last Call for RFC8773bis Muhammad Usama Sardar
- [TLS] Re: Working Group Last Call for RFC8773bis Loganaden Velvindron
- [TLS] Re: Working Group Last Call for RFC8773bis Russ Housley