[TLS] Complaint to IAB regarding a declaration of consensus to adopt a non-hybrid draft
"D. J. Bernstein" <djb@cr.yp.to> Wed, 08 April 2026 19:40 UTC
Return-Path: <djb-dsn2-1406711340.7506@cr.yp.to>
X-Original-To: tls@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: tls@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13C93D84A591 for <tls@mail2.ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Apr 2026 12:40:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1775677232; bh=vgXNXbQRgodVqzyxAcKU/RbvqWdF8iR7+8nSqe25Ma0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject; b=BwjfsXJDeGxTEUzr2huHV2Wm3B1dbo9Ul2EgbfZ/iafzfSIVPpZ5GHWGn7J8riGgI xJ2xNx2Me+SF8stxoBEi32pHggcVZd5w50iePd5vXdcAK7lvow68Cjt7HTvsCOO13k xruUTantKtXqRzaut2tedi7wYmkEOYpDKej3uoow=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.197
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.197 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id t4vnFUGLD5uR for <tls@mail2.ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Apr 2026 12:40:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from salsa.cs.uic.edu (salsa.cs.uic.edu [131.193.32.108]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AF3F1D84A581 for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Apr 2026 12:40:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 3230444 invoked by uid 1010); 8 Apr 2026 19:40:24 -0000
Received: from unknown (unknown) by unknown with QMTP; 8 Apr 2026 19:40:24 -0000
Received: (qmail 928718 invoked by uid 1000); 8 Apr 2026 19:40:16 -0000
Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2026 19:40:16 -0000
Message-ID: <20260408194016.928716.qmail@cr.yp.to>
From: "D. J. Bernstein" <djb@cr.yp.to>
To: iab@iab.org
Mail-Followup-To: tls@ietf.org
Message-ID-Hash: GDTKKMXREIIT43WSYKE5IPMHI7YCPUHO
X-Message-ID-Hash: GDTKKMXREIIT43WSYKE5IPMHI7YCPUHO
X-MailFrom: djb-dsn2-1406711340.7506@cr.yp.to
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-tls.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [TLS] Complaint to IAB regarding a declaration of consensus to adopt a non-hybrid draft
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/CmyLIU7HMsgEvQy-N7WhqtfhStw>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:tls-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:tls-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:tls-leave@ietf.org>
Dear IAB: I am writing to file https://cr.yp.to/2026/20260408-non-hybrid.pdf with you. For transparency, I am cc'ing tls@ietf.org; for the same reason, I request that you use tls@ietf.org for acknowledgment of receipt and for all followup discussions and questions. ---D. J. Bernstein ===== NOTICES ===== This document may not be modified, and derivative works of it may not be created, and it may not be published except as an Internet-Draft. (That sentence is the official language from IETF's "Legend Instructions" for the situation that "the Contributor does not wish to allow modifications nor to allow publication as an RFC". I'm fine with redistribution of copies of this document; the issue is with modification. Legend language also appears in, e.g., RFC 5831. For further background on the relevant IETF rules, see https://cr.yp.to/2025/20251024-rules.pdf.)
- [TLS] Re: Complaint to IAB regarding a declaratio… Michael StJohns
- [TLS] Complaint to IAB regarding a declaration of… D. J. Bernstein